Search found 5 matches

Return to “Fix 30.06 & 30.07 Sign Requirements”

by Ruark
Thu Mar 30, 2017 12:16 pm
Forum: 2017 Legislative Wish List
Topic: Fix 30.06 & 30.07 Sign Requirements
Replies: 68
Views: 32120

Re: Fix 30.06 & 30.07 Sign Requirements

Soccerdad1995 wrote:How can I, as a property owner argue that you have harmed my right to enjoy my property by carrying a gun, by being a Christian, by believe in Hitlery, or anything else, when these things are not even apparent?
Because "harming your right to enjoy your property" isn't a prerequisite for barring somebody from entering it. You don't need a reason. I can bar you or ask you to leave because I'm in the mood for it.

Granted, I wish we COULD get rid of the 06 signs - they're utterly silly, because only law-abiding people will comply with them, while criminal shooters will ignore them - but it's not going to happen.
by Ruark
Thu Mar 30, 2017 11:38 am
Forum: 2017 Legislative Wish List
Topic: Fix 30.06 & 30.07 Sign Requirements
Replies: 68
Views: 32120

Re: Fix 30.06 & 30.07 Sign Requirements

Our rights extend only as far as the door of someone else's business/property.
This is pretty much the bottom line, all the speeches notwithstanding. That business is their private property, just like their living room, and they can make any rules they want to. If they so desired, they could put up a sign saying "black socks not allowed" and it would be perfectly legit.
by Ruark
Sat Mar 25, 2017 8:46 pm
Forum: 2017 Legislative Wish List
Topic: Fix 30.06 & 30.07 Sign Requirements
Replies: 68
Views: 32120

Re: Fix 30.06 & 30.07 Sign Requirements

Abraham wrote:Ruark,

Poor me, awwwwww!
Whatsa matter, Abe? Ants get in your supper bowl again?
by Ruark
Fri Mar 24, 2017 10:22 am
Forum: 2017 Legislative Wish List
Topic: Fix 30.06 & 30.07 Sign Requirements
Replies: 68
Views: 32120

Re: Fix 30.06 & 30.07 Sign Requirements

Abraham wrote:Ruark,

I don't understand your perspective.

When I encounter a 30.06 posted business, where I have a choice, (not to include voting places, hospitals, etc.) my alternative is to go elsewhere.

Right?

Not right?

Please elaborate.

I'm not trying to be contentious, just trying to understand, as seeking an alternative business that's not posted is, as far as I know, my only other choice if I won't disarm.

So, what am I not understanding?

Or, perhaps, you're saying businesses shouldn't have the right to post 30.06?

O.K., color me confused.

Thanks!
Sigh... some people take it upon themselves to be confused. A good place to start would be reading my post. I said it's not always feasible to just "go somewhere else," like you just drove 20 miles with your wife to eat, and there's an 06 sign and the only other choice is on the other side of town, or it's 110 degrees outside and traffic's jammed and you're exhausted and hungry. So if you want to get back into your car and drive around "seeking an alternative business," knock yourself out.
by Ruark
Wed Mar 22, 2017 3:39 pm
Forum: 2017 Legislative Wish List
Topic: Fix 30.06 & 30.07 Sign Requirements
Replies: 68
Views: 32120

Re: Fix 30.06 & 30.07 Sign Requirements

infoman wrote:I disagree with your post. you as the consumer shouldn't shop there/eat there if you don't like them posting a 30.06/30.07 sign.
No, it's very often infeasible to simply "go somewhere else." I hate it when people say this.

Return to “Fix 30.06 & 30.07 Sign Requirements”