Search found 2 matches

by Rrash
Sat Jan 31, 2015 3:58 pm
Forum: Texas Firearms Coalition
Topic: New Article: Open-Carry Bills Must Preserve 30.06
Replies: 10
Views: 9110

Re: New Article: Open-Carry Bills Must Preserve 30.06

RPBrown wrote:Now for another question on this, if the off limit areas are removed and we can carry wherever a peace officer can, will 30.06 still be enforceable?
If it is a privately owned business, I would think they should still have that right.
by Rrash
Fri Jan 30, 2015 12:45 pm
Forum: Texas Firearms Coalition
Topic: New Article: Open-Carry Bills Must Preserve 30.06
Replies: 10
Views: 9110

Re: New Article: Open-Carry Bills Must Preserve 30.06

I completely agree that 30.06 needs to apply only to concealed carry, having nothing to do with open carry. My concern is that having two different signs will actually produce more 30.06 signs. If I am an anti-gun business owner, and I go through the trouble of putting up a 30.07 sign, why wouldn't I go ahead and put up a 30.06 as well? And if we made a sign that worked for both 30.06 and 30.07 (call it 30.08 for the sake of argument), why wouldn't I post that sign to save space? Even if you are given a verbal warning, I would assume it applies to all forms of legal carrying. I guess that is the inevitable consequence? Am I missing something?

I'm certainly in favor of open carry, but I think it is going to have at least a temporary backlash on concealed carry. I think it already has.

Return to “New Article: Open-Carry Bills Must Preserve 30.06”