TexasCHLforum.com

G.A. Heath wrote:This is a flaw with unlicensed carry and federal law. To fix this issue you would have to go to the federal level and correct the problem there.

I'll get excited about this when that is dealt with.

At minimum, we need an unofficial mandate to federal LEO like what was done in the pot legalization states (don't arrest for pot possession).

Lambda Force wrote:

Stripes Dude wrote:So what's the solve for federal statute that requires a CHl from the resident state to legally pass through a school zone? Are we supposed to ignore this?

1. GFSZA requires a license from the state the school is in, not a resident license.
2. MPA already opened that can of worms.

Ok, I stand corrected. Makes absolutely no difference. Still illegal federally. MPA was step one, constitutional carry is step two of going down the path of not dealing with the bigger issue.

If the bill authors were smart, they'd prohibit state LEO from bringing charges if carrying under constitutional carry in a school zone, unless much grater crimes are simultaneously being committed.

Still doesn't solve the problem though.

So what's the solve for federal statute that requires a CHl from the resident state to legally pass through a school zone? Are we supposed to ignore this?

Wish the powers that be who are involved in this constitutional carry fight would address this. They all seem to be missing this very important fact.

My neighborhood is surrounded by school zones. I won't be able to leave the house if I don't have a Chl even if constitutional carry passes.

This needs addressed or this is a moot law for many people...unless you're willing to drive around avoiding school zones.