Excellent synopsis, thank you. Was the assailant on drugs, or just adrenalined up? That's a lot of hits to take and keep moving. Mr. Dicken did indeed do a fine job, though.Paladin wrote: ↑Thu Jan 05, 2023 9:58 amThat is a good article!ELB wrote: ↑Thu Jan 05, 2023 9:35 am Nice article:
https://www.americas1stfreedom.org/cont ... by-police/
Does anyone actually believe the FBI with their capability to illegally monitor everything online could not locate this guy???This is sad. Situational awareness is life and death:The FBI had received a tip about his online account in 2019, but never located its owner.Great breakdown here:The first person he encountered, Victor Gomez, also happened to be carrying concealed that day, but was ambushed at point blank and never had a chance.Outstanding job Eli!!!Dicken had come to the food court with his girlfriend for dinner, and was seated next to a column and trash can. The instant the shots rang out, Dicken pushed his girlfriend to the ground, drew his Glock 19, braced himself on the trash can and opened fire at a distance of 42 yards. At this distance, Dicken fired four times, hitting the murderer twice, with Dicken pausing only when panicked shoppers ran through his line of sight.
The injured murderer, rifle still in hand, retreated towards the bathroom. Dicken closed to within 20 yards and shot the murderer with another four shots. The murderer started to go down, but was still struggling to make it to the bathroom. Concerned for potential further carnage, Dicken closed in to about 25 feet and fired twice more. The murderer slumped over and didn’t move.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Mall Shooting in Indiana”
- Thu Jan 05, 2023 11:37 am
- Forum: Self-Defense Reports
- Topic: Mall Shooting in Indiana
- Replies: 48
- Views: 19498
Re: Mall Shooting in Indiana
- Tue Jul 19, 2022 10:49 am
- Forum: Self-Defense Reports
- Topic: Mall Shooting in Indiana
- Replies: 48
- Views: 19498
Re: Mall Shooting in Indiana
The antis are saying he was "illegally carrying" in the mall because it has "No Guns" signs posted. However, from my understanding, those signs have no force of law in Indiana. Someone in charge of the property/business must see someone carrying, decide they don't want a gun there, and then tell the carrier to leave. Then, if the carrier doesn't leave, the person in charge can call the police and report it as trespassing. So, those signs in that mall were as worthless against the man carrying as they were for the violent criminal he stopped. The antis just don't understand anything that happens outside of their "utopian" enclaves.