The D.C. Wrenn Circuit case is certainly worth the read. You can locate it in pdf format with a simple google search.
Will the Supreme Court hear the case? Who knows. Remember, it refused to hear the Peruta case out of California. It also let stand the AR15 ban cases out of Maryland and Illinois.
My take is that the Supreme Court is uncomfortable writing on second amendment cases because it is confused about what to do and concerned about the gravity of its decision one way or the other. I bet it would rather hear a commerce clause case any day of the week.
Well, stay-tuned folks and we will see what happens!
Search found 2 matches
Return to “DC: Fed Court of Appeals rules public carry of firearms a "core" right”
- Fri Sep 29, 2017 8:11 am
- Forum: Federal
- Topic: DC: Fed Court of Appeals rules public carry of firearms a "core" right
- Replies: 45
- Views: 15173
- Sun Aug 27, 2017 6:50 am
- Forum: Federal
- Topic: DC: Fed Court of Appeals rules public carry of firearms a "core" right
- Replies: 45
- Views: 15173
Re: DC: Fed Court of Appeals rules public carry of firearms a "core" right
Sadly, legal nihilism and postmodernism are eating up our courts. It is no longer a question of the rule of law--it is simply what the majority of justices want the law to be. Don't worry--they will fill in the "legal reasoning" as they need to. We see it everywhere on second amendment cases and especially in the ninth circuit.