TexasCHLforum.com

GrillKing

TAM, yes, I believe I mis-read your post the first time. Thanks for catching that and noting it in your post. I have done so in my original post as well.... We are in agreement!

GrillKing

The Annoyed Man wrote:
GrillKing wrote:
The Annoyed Man wrote:
JJVP wrote:I keep hearing that the ALL or Nothing approach will get us nothing. That we need baby steps to get us there. Fine, here is my proposal for baby steps. First remove the restrictions for Churches, for ALL CHL's. Next time they can remove the restrictions on profesional sporting events, for ALL CHL's. Then they can go for the 51%, again for ALL CHL's. Baby steps.

I will not support in any way a piece of legislation that exempts politicians from the laws we are expected to obey. I will also not support legislation that gives "special privileges" to some CHL's, but no others. Whatever is done should apply to ALL CHL's or to none.

I have great respect to what Charles has done for guns rights in Texas. This, however is a case where we will never see eye to eye.
How will you feel about it after his method has proven successful?
And it will prove unsuccessful. One step at a time got us where we are today and one step at a time will continue to get us where we want to be. I believe "all or nothing" will land us closer to nothing. I completely trust Charles, I appreciate his work on Texas RKBA, and will go with his suggestions on how we should proceed. I will do so even when some details cannot be made public at the time. His track record is PROVEN!
I think you misread my previous posts. I trust Charles too. I was the one urging others to trust him. SEE THIS POST FROM PAJAMAS MEDIA.

TAM, I edited my post to change "unsuccessful" to "SUCCESSFUL" which is what I meant. This is very clear if you read the rest of my post. You probably quit reading after my first sentance as with the mistake I made, it is blatantly untrue as originally erroneously posted. I was thinking at the time that I was typing that the all or nothing approach would be unsuccessful whereas you stated the incremental would be successful. I got my brain to paper wires crossed. You and I are on the same page!!! To be perfectly clear, my position is: Charles' approach, the incremental approach, is tried and true and has the absolute highest probablilty of success, and is the method we should utilize.

GrillKing

The Annoyed Man wrote:
JJVP wrote:I keep hearing that the ALL or Nothing approach will get us nothing. That we need baby steps to get us there. Fine, here is my proposal for baby steps. First remove the restrictions for Churches, for ALL CHL's. Next time they can remove the restrictions on profesional sporting events, for ALL CHL's. Then they can go for the 51%, again for ALL CHL's. Baby steps.

I will not support in any way a piece of legislation that exempts politicians from the laws we are expected to obey. I will also not support legislation that gives "special privileges" to some CHL's, but no others. Whatever is done should apply to ALL CHL's or to none.

I have great respect to what Charles has done for guns rights in Texas. This, however is a case where we will never see eye to eye.
How will you feel about it after his method has proven successful?

And it will prove SUCCESSFUL. One step at a time got us where we are today and one step at a time will continue to get us where we want to be. I believe "all or nothing" will land us closer to nothing. I completely trust Charles, I appreciate his work on Texas RKBA, and will go with his suggestions on how we should proceed. I will do so even when some details cannot be made public at the time. His track record is PROVEN!

EDITED: Changed unsuccessful to SUCCESSFUL (which is what I meant!!!)

TexasCHLforum.com

Search found 3 matches

Re: CALL TO ACTION: SB905

Re: CALL TO ACTION: SB905

Re: CALL TO ACTION: SB905