I know I'm telling Noah about the flood, but It's not better! The only opposition is from the security industry and even that is silly. There isn't enough money in the church market to make a dent in their revenue.Soccerdad1995 wrote:I tend to agree with this. Right now, the law seems to prefer that we just have an uncoordinated armed response with no prior planning. I struggle to understand how that is better than allowing people to coordinate their response plan to the most likely potential security scenarios a congregation may face.
It is a bit like legally banning a family from having any formal plan / roles for family members in the case of a fire.
Chas.