Search found 364 matches

by TrueFlog
Fri Jun 18, 2021 8:49 am
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: Navy Federal C U ???
Replies: 11
Views: 14869

Re: Navy Federal C U ???

I recently did an auto loan through RBFCU, and I was very pleased with them. If I were going to refinance my mortgage or take out any new loan, I would strongly consider them. They have a decent number of branches throughout DFW, they've got great rates, and their customer service is pretty good.
by TrueFlog
Wed May 26, 2021 3:04 pm
Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
Topic: Another Meme Thread
Replies: 3524
Views: 1547065

Re: Another Meme Thread

Carrying a handgun in Texas after 9/1/2021...

Image
by TrueFlog
Mon May 24, 2021 6:05 pm
Forum: General Legislative Discussions
Topic: HB2622 passes , creates sanctuary state
Replies: 7
Views: 16055

Re: HB2622 passes , creates sanctuary state

The GFSZA is a federal law. Does this mean local and state officials can’t enforce it? If I'm not mistaken I believe that HB2622 refers to new federal gun laws passed after the date of the bill. I could be mistaken, though. Thanks. There is a reference to January 19, 2021. HB2622 covers any federal...
by TrueFlog
Mon May 24, 2021 6:00 pm
Forum: General Legislative Discussions
Topic: HB 1927 on the Senate floor now
Replies: 387
Views: 95081

Re: HB 1927 on the Senate floor now

If I'm reading this correctly, 30.06 and 30.07 signs do not apply to unlicensed carry. Is that right? That means that unlicensed Texas will be able to carry in tens of thousands of locations that are currently off-limits to license holders due to 30.06 and 30.07 signs. That seems kind of backwards....
by TrueFlog
Mon May 24, 2021 3:54 pm
Forum: General Legislative Discussions
Topic: HB 1927 on the Senate floor now
Replies: 387
Views: 95081

Re: HB 1927 on the Senate floor now

If I'm reading this correctly, 30.06 and 30.07 signs do not apply to unlicensed carry. Is that right? That means that unlicensed Texas will be able to carry in tens of thousands of locations that are currently off-limits to license holders due to 30.06 and 30.07 signs. That seems kind of backwards...
by TrueFlog
Sun May 23, 2021 9:46 pm
Forum: General Legislative Discussions
Topic: HB 1927 on the Senate floor now
Replies: 387
Views: 95081

Re: HB 1927 on the Senate floor now

Sections 46.03(a) (7), (11), and (13) do not apply to license holders, and (7) is the prohibition against carrying in a 51% establishment. Does that mean that 51% bars will be removed from the list of off-limits places? No. If they properly post 30.06/7 or the 51% sign it is still an off-limits loc...
by TrueFlog
Sun May 23, 2021 7:31 pm
Forum: General Legislative Discussions
Topic: HB 1927 on the Senate floor now
Replies: 387
Views: 95081

Re: HB 1927 on the Senate floor now

Sections 46.03(a) (7), (11), and (13) do not apply
to license holders, and (7) is the prohibition against carrying in a 51% establishment. Does that mean that 51% bars will be removed from the list of off-limits places?
by TrueFlog
Thu Apr 15, 2021 5:29 pm
Forum: General Legislative Discussions
Topic: Any updates?
Replies: 167
Views: 24422

Re: Any updates?

I love Amendment 22! It should have been in the original Open Carry bill. I just hope it doesn't turn into a poison pill.

What was 21 about? Does this bill allow permitless carry on college campuses?
by TrueFlog
Thu Oct 15, 2020 8:50 am
Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
Topic: Kenosha Wisconsin Shooter discussion
Replies: 464
Views: 100394

Re: Kenosha Wisconsin Shooter discussion

Lake County prosecutors announce they will not file charges against Kyle Rittenhouse https://www.lakemchenryscanner.com/2020/10/13/lake-county-prosecutors-announce-they-will-not-file-charges-against-kyle-rittenhouse/ This is certainly good news, but he's still in grave danger. According to the arti...
by TrueFlog
Wed May 02, 2018 10:11 pm
Forum: The Crime Blotter
Topic: MI: Detroit Woman Sentenced To 2 Years For Armed Self-Defense
Replies: 13
Views: 5054

MI: Detroit Woman Sentenced To 2 Years For Armed Self-Defense

http://reason.com/blog/2018/05/02/black-gun-owner-will-give-birth-in-priso According to the article, she brandished her legally-owned firearm at a neighbor who intentionally rammed her car. The primary explanation given by the police and prosecutors is their policy of assuming that whoever calls the...
by TrueFlog
Tue Feb 20, 2018 2:25 pm
Forum: General Legislative Discussions
Topic: Texas SD8: Huffines Or Paxton?
Replies: 1
Views: 3325

Texas SD8: Huffines Or Paxton?

There doesn't seem to be a lot of information on either candidate other than your typical boilerplate Republican positions. Both candidates have run attack ads accusing the other of supporting liberal causes candidates, though I have no idea if there's any through to them. A recent TSRA email said t...
by TrueFlog
Sat Jan 06, 2018 7:15 pm
Forum: Federal
Topic: H.R.38: National Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act
Replies: 70
Views: 37017

Re: H.R.38: National Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act

How would this bill affect the ability of state and local governments to prohibit concealed carry at locations not covered by (b)(2)? In other words, would states still be able to ban concealed carry at so-called "sensitive locations" such as bars, hospitals, churches, etc.? Section (c)(1)...
by TrueFlog
Tue May 02, 2017 3:56 pm
Forum: 2017 Texas Legislative Session
Topic: SB 16 - priority bill, reduction of LTC fees
Replies: 190
Views: 65564

Re: SB 16 - priority bill, reduction of LTC fees

Guess I got bad info that it had passed a vote and was a done deal. My bad. Tired of carve outs for cops - they have been wrong on every citizen carry bill that has passed, but the legislature still makes special exemptions for them. Wondering who made the amendment that could possibly delay/kill t...
by TrueFlog
Tue May 02, 2017 3:05 pm
Forum: 2017 Texas Legislative Session
Topic: SB 16 - priority bill, reduction of LTC fees
Replies: 190
Views: 65564

Re: SB 16 - priority bill, reduction of LTC fees

According to another thread on this board, the amendment reduces the cost even further, to $15 - http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/tlodocs/85R/amendments/faspdf/SB00016H21.PDF That's not what the amendment does. It eliminates the fee for peace officers. It's still $40 for the rest of us. My bad... I g...

Go to advanced search