TexasCHLforum.com

Baytown,
Cant argue with that logic. I personally dont agree with the whole "two class system". Having just gotten out of the service, i have carried FA items in various places LEGALLY that i now cant bring a handgun into. I am not anymore likely to do something stupid now than i was back then, so what's the difference? Having said that, I dont see a problem with an LEO carrying absolutely anywhere, same goes for a CHL in my book though.

Dumb question here. I have read somewhere about a case that the supreme court decided an LEO has NO DUTY to protect/intervene if they see something going on, like the felonies mentioned above. I believe the case was Warren vs. DC--could be completely wrong though. Talking to several LEOs, they all said they would step up, but this one has always had me a bit curious as to what the truth really is on the issue. I know i will not hesistate if need be, but then again, i go places i cant carry (school, etc) so am limited to a knife at times. Anyways, getting off track. Since the Supreme Court made that ruling, and it would seem to over rule TX law, what is the case as far as LEOs requirement to act. As much as i appreciate that you all do the job you do... well, if helping me means you take a chance of not going home to your family tonight, please walk away, i'll live or die with my choices.