Search found 4 matches

by C-dub
Sun Mar 12, 2017 12:10 pm
Forum: Site Announcements, Questions & Suggestions
Topic: 30.06 vs 30.07 reporting
Replies: 26
Views: 16122

Re: 30.06 vs 30.07 reporting

ScottDLS wrote:
C-dub wrote:I think being a "publicly owned" company and a government entity are two very different things. Government entities own very few if any companies.

Regarding the 30.06 vs 30.6 issue, if the errors seem like they may be typos and just an incorrectly worded sign and everything else is correct then I would not take the chance. That doesn't mean that I'm saying it is a valid sign. I'm just saying that I can't afford to take that chance.
I can afford to take the chance (of having to fight a $200 ticket in JP court), even though I still have two children to send to college. :biggrinjester:

Now if said 30.6 sign were posted at my employer, I may consider more carefully. However, since my employer is in Rockville, MD, I typically don't carry when I'm in the office. :lol:
I still keep forgetting that penalty has been reduced. :leaving
by C-dub
Sun Mar 12, 2017 7:41 am
Forum: Site Announcements, Questions & Suggestions
Topic: 30.06 vs 30.07 reporting
Replies: 26
Views: 16122

Re: 30.06 vs 30.07 reporting

I think being a "publicly owned" company and a government entity are two very different things. Government entities own very few if any companies.

Regarding the 30.06 vs 30.6 issue, if the errors seem like they may be typos and just an incorrectly worded sign and everything else is correct then I would not take the chance. That doesn't mean that I'm saying it is a valid sign. I'm just saying that I can't afford to take that chance.
by C-dub
Sat Mar 11, 2017 8:47 am
Forum: Site Announcements, Questions & Suggestions
Topic: 30.06 vs 30.07 reporting
Replies: 26
Views: 16122

Re: 30.06 vs 30.07 reporting

Ktashford wrote:I don't think my comany has any legal standing to have 30.06 regulations but I am looking in to it.
What do you base this theory on?
by C-dub
Fri Mar 10, 2017 3:15 pm
Forum: Site Announcements, Questions & Suggestions
Topic: 30.06 vs 30.07 reporting
Replies: 26
Views: 16122

Re: 30.06 vs 30.07 reporting

Ktashford wrote:My company just posted 30.6 signs. Yes, that is correct, not a typo. The signs say 30.6 NOT 30.06. I know it's very minor but is this valid or no? I have searched and have never found another "30.6 or 30.7" sign.
That part would be incorrect and possibly make it invalid. How correct is the rest of the sign for wording and size?

Return to “30.06 vs 30.07 reporting”