I still keep forgetting that penalty has been reduced.ScottDLS wrote:I can afford to take the chance (of having to fight a $200 ticket in JP court), even though I still have two children to send to college.C-dub wrote:I think being a "publicly owned" company and a government entity are two very different things. Government entities own very few if any companies.
Regarding the 30.06 vs 30.6 issue, if the errors seem like they may be typos and just an incorrectly worded sign and everything else is correct then I would not take the chance. That doesn't mean that I'm saying it is a valid sign. I'm just saying that I can't afford to take that chance.
Now if said 30.6 sign were posted at my employer, I may consider more carefully. However, since my employer is in Rockville, MD, I typically don't carry when I'm in the office.
Search found 4 matches
Return to “30.06 vs 30.07 reporting”
- Sun Mar 12, 2017 12:10 pm
- Forum: Site Announcements, Questions & Suggestions
- Topic: 30.06 vs 30.07 reporting
- Replies: 26
- Views: 16122
Re: 30.06 vs 30.07 reporting
- Sun Mar 12, 2017 7:41 am
- Forum: Site Announcements, Questions & Suggestions
- Topic: 30.06 vs 30.07 reporting
- Replies: 26
- Views: 16122
Re: 30.06 vs 30.07 reporting
I think being a "publicly owned" company and a government entity are two very different things. Government entities own very few if any companies.
Regarding the 30.06 vs 30.6 issue, if the errors seem like they may be typos and just an incorrectly worded sign and everything else is correct then I would not take the chance. That doesn't mean that I'm saying it is a valid sign. I'm just saying that I can't afford to take that chance.
Regarding the 30.06 vs 30.6 issue, if the errors seem like they may be typos and just an incorrectly worded sign and everything else is correct then I would not take the chance. That doesn't mean that I'm saying it is a valid sign. I'm just saying that I can't afford to take that chance.
- Sat Mar 11, 2017 8:47 am
- Forum: Site Announcements, Questions & Suggestions
- Topic: 30.06 vs 30.07 reporting
- Replies: 26
- Views: 16122
Re: 30.06 vs 30.07 reporting
What do you base this theory on?Ktashford wrote:I don't think my comany has any legal standing to have 30.06 regulations but I am looking in to it.
- Fri Mar 10, 2017 3:15 pm
- Forum: Site Announcements, Questions & Suggestions
- Topic: 30.06 vs 30.07 reporting
- Replies: 26
- Views: 16122
Re: 30.06 vs 30.07 reporting
That part would be incorrect and possibly make it invalid. How correct is the rest of the sign for wording and size?Ktashford wrote:My company just posted 30.6 signs. Yes, that is correct, not a typo. The signs say 30.6 NOT 30.06. I know it's very minor but is this valid or no? I have searched and have never found another "30.6 or 30.7" sign.