TexasCHLforum.com

clarionite wrote:

sjfcontrol wrote:

clarionite wrote:
This is not the 2008 election. Romney/Biden is not McCain/Palin. Republicans that didn't make it to the polls in 2008 will make it this time. And people who supported Obama in 2008 are weaker in support, and in some cases non supportive of him this time. In 2008, my neighbor two houses down had an Obama yard sign. This year, there's one at the far end of our street, but that's it. We had quite a few Romney signs until some jerk stole them all last week. Now we have a few back, and one 4'x8' sign with a light on it at night. That one happens to be in my yard. <G>

I'm nowhere near unbiased. I honestly fear for your 1st, 2nd, and 4th amendment rights with a second Obama term.

Romney/Biden???

Still had Biden on the brain from the dog poo comment.

I appologize profusely to Ryan. My gaff was unforgivable.

clarionite wrote:
This is not the 2008 election. Romney/Biden is not McCain/Palin. Republicans that didn't make it to the polls in 2008 will make it this time. And people who supported Obama in 2008 are weaker in support, and in some cases non supportive of him this time. In 2008, my neighbor two houses down had an Obama yard sign. This year, there's one at the far end of our street, but that's it. We had quite a few Romney signs until some jerk stole them all last week. Now we have a few back, and one 4'x8' sign with a light on it at night. That one happens to be in my yard. <G>

I'm nowhere near unbiased. I honestly fear for your 1st, 2nd, and 4th amendment rights with a second Obama term.

The Annoyed Man wrote:

sjfcontrol wrote:Would that be what Joe Biden calls "stuff"?

God, that man's an idiot! I wouldn't hire him to pick up dog poo.

The Annoyed Man wrote:Exclusive: Classified cable warned consulate couldn't withstand 'coordinated attack'
By Catherine Herridge
Published October 31, 2012
FoxNews.com
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/10 ... z2AvsHeLuS

The U.S. Mission in Benghazi convened an “emergency meeting” less than a month before the assault that killed Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans, because Al Qaeda had training camps in Benghazi and the consulate could not defend against a “coordinated attack,” according to a classified cable reviewed by Fox News.

Summarizing an Aug. 15 emergency meeting convened by the U.S. Mission in Benghazi, the Aug. 16 cable marked “SECRET” said that the State Department’s senior security officer, also known as the RSO, did not believe the consulate could be protected.

“RSO (Regional Security Officer) expressed concerns with the ability to defend Post in the event of a coordinated attack due to limited manpower, security measures, weapons capabilities, host nation support, and the overall size of the compound,” the cable said.

According to a review of the cable addressed to the Office of the Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, the Emergency Action Committee was also briefed "on the location of approximately ten Islamist militias and AQ training camps within Benghazi … these groups ran the spectrum from Islamist militias, such as the QRF Brigade and Ansar al-Sharia, to ‘Takfirist thugs.’”

{snip}...

While the administration’s public statements have suggested that the attack came without warning, the Aug. 16 cable seems to undercut those claims. It was a direct warning to the State Department that the Benghazi consulate was vulnerable to attack, that it could not be defended and that the presence of anti-U.S. militias and Al Qaeda was well-known to the U.S. intelligence community.

In a three-page cable on Sept 11, the day Stevens and the three other Americans were killed, Stevens wrote about “growing problems with security” in Benghazi and “growing frustration” with the security forces and Libyan police. The ambassador saw both as “too weak to keep the country secure.”

This administration is SO FULL OF BLEEPIN BLEEPITY BLEEP that it just boggles the mind. It is frightening to consider that the election could be even remotely close. What does it say about how utterly STUPID and what willfully bad stewards of the nation that democrat voters have become?

The Annoyed Man wrote:

Jim Beaux wrote:As I approach my twilight years, I am struck by the inevitability that the party must end. And one clear, cold morning after I'm gone, my spouse will awaken in the warmth of our bedroom and be struck with the pain of learning that sometimes there isn't anymore. No more hugs, no more special moments to celebrate together, no more phone calls just to chat, no more "just one minute."

Sometimes, what we care about the most gets all used up and goes away, never to return before we can say good-bye, say "I love you." So while we have it, it's best we love it, care for it, fix it when it's broken and heal it when it's sick.

This is true for marriage.....And old cars. And children with bad report cards, And dogs with bad hips. And aging parents and grandparents. We keep them because they are worth it, because we are worth it. Some things we keep -- like a best friend who moved away or a sister-in-law after divorce. There are just some things that make us happy,no matter what.Life is important, like people we know who are special.And so, we keep them close!

Suppose one morning you never wake up, do all your friends know how you really feel? The important thing is to let every one of your friends know your true feelings, even if you think they don't love you back.So, just in case I'm gone tomorrow, please vote against that marxist, Obama.

Jim, you could have just asked. You didn't need to get all mushy on my.

smoothoperator wrote:

RoyGBiv wrote:

hillfighter wrote:A third party vote is the strongest possible vote against the status quo.

by what line of reasoning do you reach this conclusion ?

Two of the biggest problems plaguing this country are excessive government spending and the associated debt. So, let me ask two questions to the people who think Republicans are the answer.

Who was the last Republican to leave DC with lower federal spending than when they took office?
Who was the last Republican to leave DC with a lower federal debt than when they took office?

Dave2 wrote:

The Annoyed Man wrote:DNC mainstream delegates favor banning corporate profits: http://www.humanevents.com/2012/09/06/h ... e-profits/.

If that's real...







Nuts, now I have a headache again.

RoyGBiv wrote:Speaking of transparency and honor..
Here's a story about Axelrod and the DOJ leaning on Gallup after they published a poll showing Romney in the lead.

http://dailycaller.com/2012/09/06/justi ... pollsters/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Internal emails between senior officials at The Gallup Organization, obtained by The Daily Caller, show senior Obama campaign adviser David Axelrod attempting to subtly intimidate the respected polling firm when its numbers were unfavorable to the president.

After Gallup declined to change its polling methodology, Obama’s Department of Justice hit it with an unrelated lawsuit that appears damning on its face.

Disgusting.

RoyGBiv wrote:Here's a video that'll make your blood boil.
Democrats BOOING a platform amendment to include God and Jerusalem.

The Democrates, TODAY, amended their platform to include God and Jerusalem.
http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/3d281c1 ... 5130d65529" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

.... Panderers.. Insincere panderers.... Makes me sick.

Video here: Can't embed it..
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/ ... ntion.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

ETA Embedded video: Not only did it take multiple votes, but there's loud booing at the end.
What a beautiful disaster for the Donkey party.

[youtube][/youtube]

The Annoyed Man wrote:[ Image ]

RoyGBiv wrote: From May... WARNING: Strong Language: http://www.buzzfeed.com/mhastings/how-b ... -hollywood" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Embedded in that article (first paragraph) is a link to a John Lovitz profanity-laced anti-Obama "comedy" rant.
I won't link it here.. Very profane.

“I’ll write the check,” one top producer, whose films have made over a billion at the box office, told me. “But I’m not going to bother voting for him.”

The Annoyed Man wrote:Republicans eye return to gold standard
By Robin Harding and Anna Fifield in Washington
Financial Times

The gold standard has returned to mainstream US politics for the first time in 30 years, with a “gold commission” set to become part of official Republican party policy.

Drafts of the party platform, which it will adopt at a convention in Tampa Bay, Florida, next week, call for an audit of Federal Reserve monetary policy and a commission to look at restoring the link between the dollar and gold.

74novaman wrote:

sjfcontrol wrote:Wow! I may just have to buy me a Newsweek! Haven't cracked one in years.

I'd read it and leave it on the stand. 1 article delving into reality doesn't make up for YEARS of living in the land of rainbows and unicorn farts.

Remember their "Why are Obama's critics so dumb?" cover?

They'll never get a dime of my money.