Search found 2 matches

by steveincowtown
Tue Apr 07, 2015 2:56 pm
Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
Topic: Call-To-Action: HB2405 Gutting TPC §30.06
Replies: 86
Views: 15300

Re: Call-To-Action: HB2405 Gutting TPC §30.06

jerry_r60 wrote:
steveincowtown wrote:
jerry_r60 wrote:Testimony is over. The bill author closed with an opening for an amendment to take away the criminal penalty, that's what it sounded like to me. If this bill passed, I'd prefer that amendment than not, but It would be better to not have the bill and work to remove the criminal penalty from the existing 30.06.

Really? If there is no criminal penalty they can make the gun busters sign any sign that says "pull" or "push" and it is just fine by me.
Just because I won't be punished, if the code says I should not be carrying past the sign because the business owner doesnt' want me in there, I would not. I'd be happy that I wouldn't be in trouble if I missed a sign.
Hold on. I changed my mind already. Even though 30.06 wouldn't apply, wouldn't it just revert back to 30.05? And ....
2) "Notice" means:
(A) oral or written communication by the owner or someone with apparent authority to act for the owner;
by steveincowtown
Tue Apr 07, 2015 2:42 pm
Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
Topic: Call-To-Action: HB2405 Gutting TPC §30.06
Replies: 86
Views: 15300

Re: Call-To-Action: HB2405 Gutting TPC §30.06

jerry_r60 wrote:Testimony is over. The bill author closed with an opening for an amendment to take away the criminal penalty, that's what it sounded like to me. If this bill passed, I'd prefer that amendment than not, but It would be better to not have the bill and work to remove the criminal penalty from the existing 30.06.

Really? If there is no criminal penalty they can make the gun busters sign any sign that says "pull" or "push" and it is just fine by me.

Return to “Call-To-Action: HB2405 Gutting TPC §30.06”