Same meanings. The problem if different words. If you're going to make an amendment with the same meaning, then use the same words to save time!Beiruty wrote:same logical meanings, or do I miss something?
Search found 5 matches
Return to “Call-To-Action: HB910”
- Mon May 25, 2015 10:11 am
- Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
- Topic: Call-To-Action: HB910
- Replies: 272
- Views: 77514
Re: Call-To-Action: HB910
- Mon May 25, 2015 9:45 am
- Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
- Topic: Call-To-Action: HB910
- Replies: 272
- Views: 77514
Re: Call-To-Action: HB910
Cross posted from another thread:
The Huffines Amendment has been posted:
The Huffines Amendment has been posted:
Dutton Amendment:Sec. 411.2049. CERTAIN INVESTIGATORY STOPS AND INQUIRIES
PROHIBITED. A peace officer may not make an investigatory stop or
other temporary detention to inquire as to a person’s possession of
a handgun license solely because the person is carrying in a
shoulder or belt holster a partially or wholly visible handgun.
The underlines portions are different words, while the bolded portions are the same words but in a different order.Sec. 411.2049. CERTAIN INVESTIGATORY STOPS AND INQUIRIES
PROHIBITED. A peace officer may not make an investigatory stop or
other temporary detention to inquire as to whether a person
possesses a handgun license solely because the person is carrying a
partially or wholly visible handgun carried in a shoulder or belt
holster.
- Sun May 24, 2015 6:49 pm
- Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
- Topic: Call-To-Action: HB910
- Replies: 272
- Views: 77514
Re: Call-To-Action: HB910
No. That was an amendment to an amendment, which failed.thatguyoverthere wrote:Sorry, I haven't been able to keep up as much as I would like, so I've got a quick question.
I'm aware of the Dutton amendment, but the Texas legislature online site also shows an adopted amendment that would allow a city of 750,000 or more to pass a local ordinance to prohibit OC. Is that correct?
- Fri May 22, 2015 10:39 pm
- Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
- Topic: Call-To-Action: HB910
- Replies: 272
- Views: 77514
Re: Call-To-Action: HB910
Little late nowpebblebeachkid wrote:Email sent
- Fri May 22, 2015 9:23 am
- Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
- Topic: Call-To-Action: HB910
- Replies: 272
- Views: 77514
Re: Call-To-Action: HB910
From http://www.tlc.state.tx.us/gtli/legproc ... genda.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Guide to Texas Legislative Information
"No bill or resolution may be considered on its first day on the Intent Calendar."
Guide to Texas Legislative Information
"No bill or resolution may be considered on its first day on the Intent Calendar."