Reports of actual crimes and investigations, not hypothetical situations.
3 posts • Page 1 of 1
- Senior Member
- Posts: 307
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 1:11 pm
- Location: Plano
RPBrown wrote:There is a shooter on the loose and "there is no danger to the public".
Kind of a stupid remark if you ask me.
If they don't know who the shooter is, what his/her motives are, and have so little information, that they are relying on the public, for information, how can they declare that the public is safe?
Oh I get it.. this was obviously not a law abiding, LTC holder, shooting in self defense, or carrying a gun safely in a holster, which you know is a major safety concern. Nothing to see here...
Take away the Second first, and the First is gone in a second