Milt Sparks question for Charles (or anyone else)

Holsters, sights, magazines, etc.

Moderators: carlson1, Keith B

Post Reply
User avatar

Topic author
dws1117
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 1759
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 11:54 pm
Location: Spring, TX.

Milt Sparks question for Charles (or anyone else)

#1

Post by dws1117 »

Other than cost and a reinforced mouth what are the differences between the Watch six and VMII? Do they wear about the same? I can't tell from the picture on Spark's site if the Watch 6 has a sweat shield. It would be for the new Glock so a sweat shield is not necessary. Is it worth it the shell out the extra change for the VMII?
User avatar

Topic author
dws1117
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 1759
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 11:54 pm
Location: Spring, TX.

#2

Post by dws1117 »

Opps I should have looked before posting. I thought you had done a review os the W6. You've reviewed sever Spark's products but the W6 was not among them.
User avatar

HighVelocity
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 3374
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 7:54 pm
Location: DFW, TX
Contact:

#3

Post by HighVelocity »

The W6 is very thin and very difficult to reholster without removing the holster from your pants.

The VMII has a lot more leather and it takes a lot more time to make. Not to mention it costs a lot more than the W6.

I've had both and prefer the VMII.
User avatar

Topic author
dws1117
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 1759
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 11:54 pm
Location: Spring, TX.

#4

Post by dws1117 »

Thanks for the help HV.

Is the W6 so thin that when the gun is removed the mouth collapses?
User avatar

HighVelocity
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 3374
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 7:54 pm
Location: DFW, TX
Contact:

#5

Post by HighVelocity »

dws1117 wrote:
Is the W6 so thin that when the gun is removed the mouth collapses?
That's exactly what happens. Very comfortable to wear but not as user friendly as the VMII imho.
User avatar

Topic author
dws1117
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 1759
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 11:54 pm
Location: Spring, TX.

#6

Post by dws1117 »

So, in your opinion it would definitely be worth my while to spend the extra?
User avatar

HighVelocity
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 3374
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 7:54 pm
Location: DFW, TX
Contact:

#7

Post by HighVelocity »

Yes, in my opinion the VMII is much better. Before you buy though, have you considered a Comp-tac CTAC?
I sold my VMII after I got the CTAC. Thinner, faster and kydex won't absorb sweat. It's also cheaper than Sparks.

http://www.comp-tac.com
User avatar

Topic author
dws1117
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 1759
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 11:54 pm
Location: Spring, TX.

#8

Post by dws1117 »

As a matter of fact I have. Just tonight I discussed with my wife upgrading my Shirt Tucker.

I have a co-worker that has a c-tac and is willing to lend it to me for a few days to try out.

longtooth
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 12329
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2005 3:31 pm
Location: Angelina County

#9

Post by longtooth »

Take him up on the offer. It is better than adding to the weight of the holster box. I wish I had that privilege for just an hour wear before buying.
Image
Carry 24-7 or guess right.
CHL Instructor. http://www.pdtraining.us" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
NRA/TSRA Life Member - TFC Member #11

Baytown
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 402
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 3:48 pm

#10

Post by Baytown »

But leather is so much sexier. ;-)

Glenn
Winners never quit, and quitters never win; but, if you never win, and never quit, you're a moron.
Post Reply

Return to “Holsters & Accessories”