HB195 v. HB??/SB??: Are storm clouds gathering?

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

Locked

CoffeeNut
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 799
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 5:52 am
Location: San Antonio

Re: HB195 v. HB??/SB??: Are storm clouds gathering?

#61

Post by CoffeeNut »

C-dub wrote:
Miguel Reynaga wrote:So far there are three bills introduced for the House but more are to come. I will be communicating with my local rep this coming week. He's assured me he is submitting something similar to HB195.
Why is it so hard to understand that we already HAVE this right, guaranteed to us by BIRTH. Why must we be licensed to use it. You do NOT need a license to speak freely or write freely. You don't need a license to operate this forum. You don't need a license to deny being illegally searched or to refuse to answer questions in court. So WHY should I need a license for my 2nd amendment rights?
For those with CHL let them keep it, they can hide all they want but should they choose not to hide then they can do so freely.
If you surrender your rights, even a little, then you don't deserve them.
We're hiding? Is that really what you think? Are you in some way disqualified from having a CHL? Is that why you are so bitter towards those that have a CHL?

I guess we all knew these folks would be coming out of the woodwork the closer we got to the legislative sessions. :banghead:
I thought it was an OCT requirement to be stripped of your CHL?

:biggrinjester:
EDC: Sig Sauer P320SC / P238

n5wd
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1597
Joined: Sat Aug 06, 2011 1:16 am
Location: Ponder, TX

Re: HB195 v. HB??/SB??: Are storm clouds gathering?

#62

Post by n5wd »

Selcouth wrote:Does anyone have a list of what businesses have put up 30.06 signs due to OCT walks?
How could anyone possibly know that? There's no registration that someone posting a 30.06 sign has to make saying why they are posting the sign.
NRA-Life member, NRA Instructor, NRA RSO, TSRA member,
Vietnam (AF) Veteran -- Amateur Extra class amateur radio operator: N5WD

Email: CHL@centurylink.net

Valente Gonzalez
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 40
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2014 8:54 pm

Re: HB195 v. HB??/SB??: Are storm clouds gathering?

#63

Post by Valente Gonzalez »

Charles,
A little background on me,I am an NRA annual member, and I an OCT Admin for Houston, a CHL Holder, among other things, I was very active in the 79th legislative session, and I worked with allies to bring some sanity to Deferred Adjudication in Texas, so my legislative experience is not "none". I supported several republican get out the vote events right here in HTown this last November, I know a little bit about legislative action and I am willing to work with others to see it through, I would like to work with you as well. The fact is OCT CATI OCTC and other open carry groups will gravitate to HB195 because it is the most liberty minded bill at the moment, and it complies with our goals of achieving constitutional open carry, it is what we stand for. I am familiar with how emotional people get when they invest so much time and effort into a cause, I don't want personal feelings to get in the way of our achieving goals. Being pragmatic is not our strong suit however, and some of our members have sacrificed much to get us where we are today.

About the Facebook Cop posts, If you came to me as a friend and said "look pal your anti cop posts aren't OK with the company I keep" If you explained to me that they are counter productive then I would change my tune especially if I knew you had a plan to do something important and were trying to influence some outcome that required a degree of discretion, unfriending me was the easier way to achieve distancing yourself from me, and that's fine. You could change your Facebook settings so that no one could see your Facebook friends, not that you have to do it for my sake, but just a thought. I will not defend injustice done against our civilian populations by our civil servants, the people have a right to know what their public servants are capable of doing, they are accountable to "we the people" and the people should know what goes on with those who we entrust to enforce our laws, it is called accountability.

Charles, I am in your area, I am an OCT Administrator, and I am out of the loop on what the NRA is doing, I hope you are not out of the Loop on what we are doing because we make no secret of it, all that needs to happen is someone joins the page and attend our weekly meeting (not that you have to keep me in the loop) It would be good however considering I am coordinating OC walks and events in your area, it would be nice if I knew someone over at the NRA that would like to talk with me about local OC efforts. Other than an NRA hat guy that approached us telling me that he supported the 2nd amendment because he had a CHL and an NRA Recruiter who was totally supportive of what we were doing, that I met up in Ft Worth,I haven't really met up with any other proud NRA supporters other than yourself (I value your interaction). Look I support some of what the NRA is doing, but I am busy trying to achieve Open Carry and I am not sure how to approach the NRA to say"look we want this" because I feel that would be redundant as CJ and others have probably already done that.

I know you are on the NRA board of directors, I am an NRA annual member, and and OCT Admin. I don't want to burn any bridges, I rather build them reasonably and succeed in achieving our goals.

Good luck to you Sir, and remember my door is always open to discuss OCT Open Carry efforts in Houston and over all strategy for OC. This is about doing the right thing to fix the law so it is in line with our wishes and our constitution, that is my wish.

Carry On,
Valente Gonzalez
OCT Houston Admin
Last edited by Valente Gonzalez on Mon Nov 17, 2014 9:23 am, edited 7 times in total.

Valente Gonzalez
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 40
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2014 8:54 pm

Re: HB195 v. HB??/SB??: Are storm clouds gathering?

#64

Post by Valente Gonzalez »

SewTexas wrote:This is Mr. Cotton's house. One does not go into another person's house and throw a party for one's own friends.
Correct, and with respect, I agree, and :txflag:

Good day Sirs,
Valente

Cedar Park Dad
Banned
Posts in topic: 11
Posts: 2064
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2013 7:19 am
Location: Cedar Park Texas

Re: HB195 v. HB??/SB??: Are storm clouds gathering?

#65

Post by Cedar Park Dad »

C-dub wrote:
chcknhawk wrote: CJ Grisham
Open Carry Texas
Blah blah blah.

BTW, thanks for getting more businesses to put up more 30.06 signs, NOT.
Agreed. With friends like that, who needs enemies?

CJ Grisham
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 11
Posts: 11
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2013 9:38 pm

Re: HB195 v. HB??/SB??: Are storm clouds gathering?

#66

Post by CJ Grisham »

G.A. Heath wrote:
CJ Grisham wrote:
G.A. Heath wrote:Interesting first posts guys, I guess CJ has called for an OC march on this forum?.

When did I do any such thing?
Don't know if you did or didn't, that's the point of "I guess" but who knows. However it's odd that a number of people show up echoing your sentiments for their first post.
Or may the same person that informed me of this post attacking OCT is informing others. Your bias is showing.
Last edited by CJ Grisham on Mon Nov 17, 2014 10:44 am, edited 1 time in total.

Cedar Park Dad
Banned
Posts in topic: 11
Posts: 2064
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2013 7:19 am
Location: Cedar Park Texas

Re: HB195 v. HB??/SB??: Are storm clouds gathering?

#67

Post by Cedar Park Dad »

CJ Grisham wrote:
Charles L. Cotton wrote:
Selcouth wrote:If so, then someone would have to be able to give the date OCT started their in-store demonstrations.
We never did "in-store demonstrations." Never. That's the problem, Charles. You still have no concept of the reality behind our actions. Every place we've gone into we were invited or secured permission first. We have never used a business for a demonstration.
So you're denying Fatman and Snowboots are part of your crew? Were you with the guys that went into Target, or were filmed in a Chilis making fools of yourselves?

A very short list where they stopped just short of 30.06s right after these demonstrations:
Starbucks
Target
User avatar

Topic author
Charles L. Cotton
Site Admin
Posts in topic: 31
Posts: 17787
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:31 pm
Location: Friendswood, TX
Contact:

Re: HB195 v. HB??/SB??: Are storm clouds gathering?

#68

Post by Charles L. Cotton »

valno600 wrote:Charles,
A little background on me,I am an NRA annual member, and I an OCT Admin for Houston, a CHL Holder, among other things, I was very active in the 79th legislative session, and I worked with allies to bring some sanity to Deferred Adjudication in Texas, so my legislative experience is not "none". I supported several republican get out the vote events right here in HTown this last November, I know a little bit about legislative action and I am willing to work with others to see it through, I would like to work with you as well.
If you really were active in the 2005 Texas Legislative Session, then you know your statement about the NRA only fighting a defensive battle was false. BTW, do you happen to know how many pro-gun bills were passed in 2005? Do you know who was the driving force behind every one of those bills?
valno600 wrote:The fact is OCT CATI OCTC and other open carry groups will gravitate to HB195 because it is the most liberty minded bill at the moment, and it complies with our goals of achieving constitutional open carry, it is what we stand for.
There's a big difference between gravitating to one particular bill v. the Founder and President of OCT calling Rep. White's HB106 a "crappy bill" and telling OCT members to say "no no no" to anything other than HB195. Just to be clear, HB106 is NOT an NRA or TSRA bill. Ours will come later.

Please answer my question. Do you agree that OCT will be successful in the 2015 Texas Legislative Session only if HB195 passes? Neither you nor CJ want to answer the question and everyone knows why.
valno600 wrote:I am familiar with how emotional people get when they invest so much time and effort into a cause, I don't want personal feelings to get in the way of our achieving goals. Being pragmatic is not our strong suit however, and some of our members have sacrificed much to get us where we are today.
"Likes" and "Joins" on Facebook pages and Facebook Groups mean nothing in terms of true membership and both of those numbers for OCT have grown very little in the last several months. This is purely speculation on my part, but I suspect this is because of the increasingly radical position taken by OCT leadership (you and CJ) on issues even beyond open-carry. OCT initially claimed to support licensed open-carry, then it morphed into an organization that was not only more radical, but one that changed its goal to "unlicensed open-carry or nothing."
valno600 wrote:Charles, I am in your area, I am an OCT Administrator, and I am out of the loop on what the NRA is doing, I hope you are not out of the Loop on what we are doing because we make no secret of it, all that needs to happen is someone joins the page and attend our weekly meeting (not that you have to keep me in the loop) It would be good however considering I am coordinating OC walks and events in your area, it would be nice if I knew someone over at the NRA that would like to talk with me about local OC efforts. Other than an NRA hat guy that approached us telling me that he supported the 2nd amendment because he had a CHL and an NRA Recruiter who was totally supportive of what we were doing, that I met up in Ft Worth,I haven't really met up with any other proud NRA supporters other than yourself (I value your interaction). Look I support some of what the NRA is doing, but I am busy trying to achieve Open Carry and I am not sure how to approach the NRA to say"look we want this" because I feel that would be redundant as CJ and others have probably already done that.

I know you are on the NRA board of directors, I am an NRA annual member, and and OCT Admin. I don't want to burn any bridges, I rather build them reasonably and succeed in achieving our goals.

Good luck to you Sir, and remember my door is always open to discuss OCT Open Carry efforts in Houston and over all strategy for OC. This is about doing the right thing to fix the law so it is in line with our wishes and our constitution, that is my wish.

Carry On,
Valente Gonzalez
OCT Houston Admin
Valente, this all sounds good on paper, but you know that your leader, CJ Grisham, is completely opposed to everything you have typed. Alice Tripp, Tara Mica and I tried to keep from seeing a rift grow between NRA/TSRA and OCT, but CJ wasn't having any of it. Have you listened to either the Open Carry Report podcast (Alice, CJ & me) or the Gun Talk Radio program (CJ & me) where we were offering suggestions to CJ as to how open-carry is more likely to pass? (Heck, I even offered a way for me/us to give CJ and OCT credit for doing something positive, but that fell on deaf ears.) If so, then you know you and CJ are singing from totally different hymn books. If you have heard either or both, then you know the "unlicensed open carry or nothing" approach was developed after those programs, making it impossible to work with him or OCT. OCT and CJ (I think you also) have openly and repeatedly vowed to oppose the reelection of any Representative or Senator who doesn't support unlicensed open-carry. That is just plain folly. First, you don't get legislation passed by making such sweeping threats, especially when your organization cannot impact elections. Equally important is the fact that such absurd proclamations prove that OCT doesn't care one whit about advancing gun rights overall; all it cares about is passing unlicensed open-carry. That appeals to only a very small percentage of Texas gun owners. That's why you don't see even a fraction of your 18,000 Facebook page "likes" or Facebook Group "joins" posting that garbage.

Although I have nothing against OCT's "members," I cannot, will not, and have no desire to be associated with OCT or any of its leadership. This isn't personal, it comes from three and a half decades of political/legislative experience. I will continue to work for gun owners, including OCT "members" who "joined" before the bait-and-switch, as I have for over 35 years. There is a way to change my mind. CJ needs to resign, OCT needs to disavow all of its prior radical acts, OCT needs to reverse its "unlicensed open-carry or nothing," and OCT needs to demonstrate with signs and carrots in holsters. (The carrot idea went over great at the Republican Convention and a Senator told those guys to use that approach and open-carry will be passed.) Model yourself after Students for Concealed Carry and conduct yourselves in the same respectable manner as SCC. When SCC had someone go off the reservation and start spouting counterproductive rhetoric, they were quickly shut down. SCC is a very well-respected organization.

Now, I'll sit back and wait for all of these changes.
Chas.
User avatar

Topic author
Charles L. Cotton
Site Admin
Posts in topic: 31
Posts: 17787
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:31 pm
Location: Friendswood, TX
Contact:

Re: HB195 v. HB??/SB??: Are storm clouds gathering?

#69

Post by Charles L. Cotton »

CJ Grisham wrote:
G.A. Heath wrote:
CJ Grisham wrote:
G.A. Heath wrote:Interesting first posts guys, I guess CJ has called for an OC march on this forum?.

When did I do any such thing?
Don't know if you did or didn't, that's the point of "I guess" but who knows. However it's odd that a number of people show up echoing your sentiments for their first post.
Or may the same person that informed me of this post attacking OCT is informing others. Your bias is showing.
When are you going to answer my straight forward questions?

Chas.

CJ Grisham
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 11
Posts: 11
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2013 9:38 pm

Re: HB195 v. HB??/SB??: Are storm clouds gathering?

#70

Post by CJ Grisham »

Cedar Park Dad wrote:So you're denying Fatman and Snowboots are part of your crew? Were you with the guys that went into Target, or were filmed in a Chilis making fools of yourselves?

A very short list where they stopped just short of 30.06s right after these demonstrations:
Starbucks
Target
You're violating the rules of the forum with your name calling. Wouldn't want your posts to get deleted. Unless of course there are different rules for different people.

CJ Grisham
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 11
Posts: 11
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2013 9:38 pm

Re: HB195 v. HB??/SB??: Are storm clouds gathering?

#71

Post by CJ Grisham »

Charles L. Cotton wrote:
When are you going to answer my straight forward questions?

Chas.
When I get around to it and have less important things to do.
User avatar

Topic author
Charles L. Cotton
Site Admin
Posts in topic: 31
Posts: 17787
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:31 pm
Location: Friendswood, TX
Contact:

Re: HB195 v. HB??/SB??: Are storm clouds gathering?

#72

Post by Charles L. Cotton »

Charles L. Cotton wrote:
Miguel Reynaga wrote:So far there are three bills introduced for the House but more are to come. I will be communicating with my local rep this coming week. He's assured me he is submitting something similar to HB195.
Why is it so hard to understand that we already HAVE this right, guaranteed to us by BIRTH. Why must we be licensed to use it. You do NOT need a license to speak freely or write freely. You don't need a license to operate this forum. You don't need a license to deny being illegally searched or to refuse to answer questions in court. So WHY should I need a license for my 2nd amendment rights?
For those with CHL let them keep it, they can hide all they want but should they choose not to hide then they can do so freely.
If you surrender your rights, even a little, then you don't deserve them.
Who is your Representative?

Chas.
Miguel, I'd really like to know who is going to file another unlicensed open-carry bill. Please tell us who is your Representative.

Chas.
User avatar

Topic author
Charles L. Cotton
Site Admin
Posts in topic: 31
Posts: 17787
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:31 pm
Location: Friendswood, TX
Contact:

Re: HB195 v. HB??/SB??: Are storm clouds gathering?

#73

Post by Charles L. Cotton »

CJ Grisham wrote:
Cedar Park Dad wrote:So you're denying Fatman and Snowboots are part of your crew? Were you with the guys that went into Target, or were filmed in a Chilis making fools of yourselves?

A very short list where they stopped just short of 30.06s right after these demonstrations:
Starbucks
Target
You're violating the rules of the forum with your name calling. Wouldn't want your posts to get deleted. Unless of course there are different rules for different people.
Show me that either of these men are Forum Members. Also, those names are the monikers by which they are now known and this didn't start on the Forum.

So how about answering his questions, since it is directly on point with your current claim that OCT never did in-store demonstrations.

Chas.
User avatar

Keith B
Moderator
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 18494
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 3:29 pm

Re: HB195 v. HB??/SB??: Are storm clouds gathering?

#74

Post by Keith B »

CJ Grisham wrote:
Cedar Park Dad wrote:So you're denying Fatman and Snowboots are part of your crew? Were you with the guys that went into Target, or were filmed in a Chilis making fools of yourselves?

A very short list where they stopped just short of 30.06s right after these demonstrations:
Starbucks
Target
You're violating the rules of the forum with your name calling. Wouldn't want your posts to get deleted. Unless of course there are different rules for different people.
Unless Fatman and Snowboots are members of this forum, then he is not violating the forum rules on personal attacks on members.

Keith B
Moderator

CJ Grisham
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 11
Posts: 11
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2013 9:38 pm

Re: HB195 v. HB??/SB??: Are storm clouds gathering?

#75

Post by CJ Grisham »

Charles L. Cotton wrote:Show me that either of these men are Forum Members? Also, those names are the monikers by which they are now known and this didn't start on the Forum.

So how about answering his questions, since it is directly on point with your current claim that OCT never did in-store demonstrations.

Chas.
"Making fools of yourselves." Not making fools of themselves. That's a direct personal attack. But, I have a thick skin, so I don't care. Just enforcing the rules YOU pointed out. I didn't expect you to see it since it conforms to things you've stated over time in the media.
Locked

Return to “2015 Legislative Session”