SB 273 - Providing civil penalties for gov't 30.06

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

Locked

Topic author
TexasCajun
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1554
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 4:58 pm
Location: La Marque, TX

SB 273 - Providing civil penalties for gov't 30.06

#1

Post by TexasCajun »

SB 273 is scheduled for public hearing on 3/2

Looks like the Senate is trying to get ahead on the 2A/gun rights issues.
Opinions expressed are subject to change without notice.
NRA TSRA TFC CHL: 9/22/12, PSC Member: 10/2012
User avatar

RoyGBiv
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 9508
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:41 am
Location: Fort Worth

Re: SB 273 - Providing civil penalties for gov't 30.06

#2

Post by RoyGBiv »

Would be interesting to know who lit the fire?
Given that a lot of this momentum is coming from the Senate, Patrick is a likely answer.
Perhaps someone also "encouraged" Straus to move his Democrat friends out of positions where they cam obstruct gun bills.? Whoever that was deserves our thanks.
I am not a lawyer. This is NOT legal advice.!
Nothing tempers idealism quite like the cold bath of reality.... SQLGeek
User avatar

baldeagle
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 5240
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 8:26 pm
Location: Richardson, TX

Re: SB 273 - Providing civil penalties for gov't 30.06

#3

Post by baldeagle »

We'll see. I wouldn't count on Strauss just yet.
The Constitution preserves the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation where the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. James Madison
NRA Life Member Texas Firearms Coalition member

Salty1
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 924
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 7:44 pm

Re: SB 273 - Providing civil penalties for gov't 30.06

#4

Post by Salty1 »

RoyGBiv wrote:Would be interesting to know who lit the fire?
Given that a lot of this momentum is coming from the Senate, Patrick is a likely answer.
Perhaps someone also "encouraged" Straus to move his Democrat friends out of positions where they cam obstruct gun bills.? Whoever that was deserves our thanks.
From my perspective I am not willing to give Straus any credit until he actually does something. The Senate is taking the lead but we also need the House to take the same approach and historically Straus has not been our friend. The bottom line is he has held up the calendar in the past which killed many Bills.
Salty1

Rrash
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 483
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 1:25 am
Location: McKinney

Re: SB 273 - Providing civil penalties for gov't 30.06

#5

Post by Rrash »

Well, in 2013, it was the Senate that pretty much killed HB 508 by adding that stupid amendment. It passed through the house with flying colors. As much as I don't trust Straus, he wasn't the problem with this bill.
User avatar

Charles L. Cotton
Site Admin
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 17787
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:31 pm
Location: Friendswood, TX
Contact:

Re: SB 273 - Providing civil penalties for gov't 30.06

#6

Post by Charles L. Cotton »

baldeagle wrote:We'll see. I wouldn't count on Strauss just yet.
:iagree: overall but he'll be fine on SB273.

Chas.

Jason K
Banned
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 336
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2013 6:57 am
Location: Close to Waco....but not too close.

Re: SB 273 - Providing civil penalties for gov't 30.06

#7

Post by Jason K »

baldeagle wrote:We'll see. I wouldn't count on Strauss just yet.
Strauss is in a tough position. He had more opposition in his Speaker run this time than ever before, but the real worry are the reps that almost didn't vote for him. If he does anything too overtly that can be used by opponents of the reps in the next election, Strauss may lose their support quick. That, plus Dan Patrick's vocal personality and visions of Ann Richards, should keep him pretty cautious about opposing too many conservative positions.
Locked

Return to “2015 Legislative Session”