Page 2 of 2
Re: Carjacking fail (WARNING GRAPHIC/LANGUAGE)
Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2023 12:13 pm
by JRG
carlson1 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 21, 2023 10:56 pm
JRG wrote: ↑Thu Dec 21, 2023 8:51 pm
carlson1 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 21, 2023 3:06 am
JRG wrote: ↑Thu Dec 21, 2023 1:33 am
carlson1 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 21, 2023 12:59 am
Has the original video been removed or is it just not viewable if you don’t have X?
I wondered the same thing Carl.
Joe
Joe I can now see it. Hope you can.
Yes, I watched it just now.
Thanks,
Joe
Yes sir. I am like some of the others said it just happens so quick out of nowhere.
Merry Christmas Joe and may God Bless your 2024 in a huge way my friend.
Carl
Same to you my brother!
Joe
Re: Carjacking fail (WARNING GRAPHIC/LANGUAGE)
Posted: Sat Dec 23, 2023 11:29 pm
by mayor
And the shooter just.... drove off.
Re: Carjacking fail (WARNING GRAPHIC/LANGUAGE)
Posted: Mon Dec 25, 2023 12:26 pm
by Rafe
mayor wrote: ↑Sat Dec 23, 2023 11:29 pm
And the shooter just.... drove off.
Or drove off to chase the attacker's vehicle. But, you're right: more evidence that it wasn't a LEO who was in the parked SUV. Never checked on the downed, twitching attacker, and drove away leaving him in the gutter.
I join the opinion that this was a drug-deal (or similar) gone wrong, not a carjacking. Would explain the parked SUV waiting in a clearly sketchy and lightly inhabited part of town; the vehicle pulling in with doors opening before it's even stopped and discharging armed assaulters; at least one occupant of the parked SUV already having guns up and expecting trouble; and the volume of immediate fire and then leaving the injured in the dirt.