Alice's and Charles' testimony was great on Gunbuster sign Bill

This forum will be open on Sept. 1, 2016.

Moderators: carlson1, Keith B, Charles L. Cotton


Topic author
NotRPB
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 1351
Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 8:24 am

Alice's and Charles' testimony was great on Gunbuster sign Bill

#1

Post by NotRPB »

http://tlchouse.granicus.com/MediaPlaye ... nt_id=2982 live stream
Charles is up now

Bill: HB 899
Legislative Session: 85(R) Council Document: 85R 4113 LHC-F
Add to Bill List | Add to Alert List
Last Action: 04/11/2017 H Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
Caption Version: Introduced
Caption Text: Relating to the notice given by a property owner prohibiting a handgun license holder from carrying a handgun on certain property.
Author: Nevárez
Subjects: Weapons (I0887)
INTERNET (S0130)
SIGNS (S0235)
PUBLIC SAFETY, DEPARTMENT OF (V0251)
House Committee: Homeland Security & Public Safety
Status: In committee
http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/BillLook ... ll=HB00899
Last edited by NotRPB on Tue Apr 11, 2017 5:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar

Vol Texan
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 2339
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 2:18 am
Location: Houston
Contact:

Re: Alice's testimony was great on Gunbuster sign Bill

#2

Post by Vol Texan »

And Charles is speaking right now! Go get-em Mr. Cotton!
Your best option for personal security is a lifelong commitment to avoidance, deterrence, and de-escalation.
When those fail, aim for center mass.

www.HoustonLTC.com Texas LTC Instructor | www.Texas3006.com Moderator | Tennessee Squire | Armored Cavalry

Topic author
NotRPB
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 1351
Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 8:24 am

Re: Alice's testimony was great on Gunbuster sign Bill

#3

Post by NotRPB »

Vol Texan wrote:And Charles is speaking right now! Go get-em Mr. Cotton!
:tiphat: :thumbs2:

hovercat
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 191
Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2015 6:36 am
Location: Pantego, TX

Re: Alice's and Charles' testimony was great on Gunbuster sign Bill

#4

Post by hovercat »

Left pending.
User avatar

ELB
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 8128
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 9:34 pm
Location: Seguin

Re: Alice's and Charles' testimony was great on Gunbuster sign Bill

#5

Post by ELB »

So HB 560 is buried in committee without so much as a nod, and (only!) three authors/co-authors signed up, and this trash -- with only the author on record -- gets a public hearing that we have to go out and fight. I expect this bill has little support on the floor, but it is using up valuable legislative time and the only good it will do is to provide some fodder to say "hey we stopped a bad bill!" Which could have been stopped with no effort at all, just like HB 560.

Priorities of the Speaker and his House.
Last edited by ELB on Tue Apr 11, 2017 5:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
USAF 1982-2005
____________

locke_n_load
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1000
Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 3:35 pm

Re: Alice's and Charles' testimony was great on Gunbuster sign Bill

#6

Post by locke_n_load »

transcripts anyone?
CHL Holder since 10/08
NRA Certified Instructor
Former LTC Instructor
User avatar

oljames3
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 5350
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2014 1:21 pm
Location: Elgin, Texas
Contact:

Re: Alice's and Charles' testimony was great on Gunbuster sign Bill

#7

Post by oljames3 »

locke_n_load wrote:transcripts anyone?
Video is archived at:
http://www.house.state.tx.us/video-audi ... dcasts/85/ for the main menu.

http://tlchouse.granicus.com/MediaPlaye ... p_id=13483 for Homeland Security & Public Safety, 4/11/17.

Works for me in Microsoft Edge. Not in Chrome. Your mileage will vary.
O. Lee James, III Captain, US Army (Retired 2012), Honorable Order of St. Barbara
2/19FA, 1st Cavalry Division 73-78; 56FA BDE (Pershing) 78-81
NRA, NRA Basic Pistol Shooting Instructor, Rangemaster Certified, GOA, TSRA, NAR L1
User avatar

WildBill
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 17350
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 12:53 pm
Location: Houston

Re: Alice's and Charles' testimony was great on Gunbuster sign Bill

#8

Post by WildBill »

oljames3 wrote:
locke_n_load wrote:transcripts anyone?
Video is archived at:
http://www.house.state.tx.us/video-audi ... dcasts/85/ for the main menu.

http://tlchouse.granicus.com/MediaPlaye ... p_id=13483 for Homeland Security & Public Safety, 4/11/17.

Works for me in Microsoft Edge. Not in Chrome. Your mileage will vary.
Thank you for posting the link! Microsoft Edge works for me.
NRA Endowment Member
User avatar

oljames3
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 5350
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2014 1:21 pm
Location: Elgin, Texas
Contact:

Re: Alice's and Charles' testimony was great on Gunbuster sign Bill

#9

Post by oljames3 »

WildBill wrote:
oljames3 wrote:
locke_n_load wrote:transcripts anyone?
Video is archived at:
http://www.house.state.tx.us/video-audi ... dcasts/85/ for the main menu.

http://tlchouse.granicus.com/MediaPlaye ... p_id=13483 for Homeland Security & Public Safety, 4/11/17.

Works for me in Microsoft Edge. Not in Chrome. Your mileage will vary.
Thank you for posting the link! Microsoft Edge works for me.
Charles and Alice are on a later session at:
http://tlchouse.granicus.com/MediaPlaye ... p_id=13496
Alice start about 4 hours, 17 minutes. Poncho is holding forth before that.
O. Lee James, III Captain, US Army (Retired 2012), Honorable Order of St. Barbara
2/19FA, 1st Cavalry Division 73-78; 56FA BDE (Pershing) 78-81
NRA, NRA Basic Pistol Shooting Instructor, Rangemaster Certified, GOA, TSRA, NAR L1

Topic author
NotRPB
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 1351
Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 8:24 am

Re: Alice's and Charles' testimony was great on Gunbuster sign Bill

#10

Post by NotRPB »

:iagree: you beat me to it
link above was morning
here is Afternoon with Alice and Charles on gunbuster sign bill (Podium instead of seated panels)
Fast Forward to 4:12
http://tlchouse.granicus.com/MediaPlaye ... p_id=13496

I'd love to drug test the (time release?) sprinkles at that cupcake shop "crazy pills" ? (just kidding) :mrgreen:

Topic author
NotRPB
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 1351
Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 8:24 am

Re: Alice's and Charles' testimony was great on Gunbuster sign Bill

#11

Post by NotRPB »

At 4:42 some woman lies & says Intent of Texas30.06 site is to alert us to non-compliant signs or something ...However, I use it and the App to know what businesses to avoid that post signs saying they don't want my business as a law abiding citizen.

cyphertext
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 689
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2014 11:31 am

Re: Alice's and Charles' testimony was great on Gunbuster sign Bill

#12

Post by cyphertext »

Since the congressman was quick to point to other states who have the gunbuster type signs like Oklahoma, I wish someone would have pointed out that those signs have no force of law. I'd be fine with going with the gunbuster sign, provided that it had no force of law or penalties by just carrying past it.

Soccerdad1995
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 4337
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 8:03 pm

Re: Alice's and Charles' testimony was great on Gunbuster sign Bill

#13

Post by Soccerdad1995 »

cyphertext wrote:Since the congressman was quick to point to other states who have the gunbuster type signs like Oklahoma, I wish someone would have pointed out that those signs have no force of law. I'd be fine with going with the gunbuster sign, provided that it had no force of law or penalties by just carrying past it.
:iagree:

Florida is another example.

We are not talking about an onerous regulation being placed on a business by the government. We are simply saying that if a private business wants to have the free use of law enforcement officers to enforce their business policies, then they need to put up a specific type of sign.

What we should be talking about is why anyone thinks it is appropriate to use publicly funded law enforcement officers to enforce a businesses' policies. Someone not following all of your rules should not be a crime unless they refuse to leave when asked.

And let's just conveniently ignore that we are talking about an underlying policy that is definitely NOT in the public interest since it increases the risk of injury and death for everyone in that location. If anything, police should be used to prevent the enforcement of dangerous business policies such as this.

Scott Farkus
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 410
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 7:18 pm
Location: Austin

Re: Alice's and Charles' testimony was great on Gunbuster sign Bill

#14

Post by Scott Farkus »

cyphertext wrote:Since the congressman was quick to point to other states who have the gunbuster type signs like Oklahoma, I wish someone would have pointed out that those signs have no force of law. I'd be fine with going with the gunbuster sign, provided that it had no force of law or penalties by just carrying past it.
Absolutely this.
Locked

Return to “2017 Texas Legislative Session”