HB421 Church Volunteer Security

This is the forum for topics directly related to desired changes in the upcoming legislative session.

Moderator: carlson1

User avatar

Topic author
troglodyte
Senior Member
Posts: 917
Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2004 4:16 pm
Location: Panhandle region
Contact:

Re: HB421

Postby troglodyte » Tue Mar 07, 2017 12:32 pm

Sounded like the committee was very much in favor of the bill. Testimony against didn't fair too well. I won't be able to catch the rest.


SewTexas
Senior Member
Posts: 2732
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 11:52 pm
Location: San Antonio area

Re: HB421

Postby SewTexas » Tue Mar 07, 2017 1:21 pm

Y'all is Renaldi correct? that unarmed security teams are illegal also?
~Tracy
Gun control is what you talk about when you don't want to talk about the truth ~ Colion Noir

User avatar

rtschl
Senior Member
Posts: 567
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 1:50 pm
Location: Fort Worth

Re: HB421

Postby rtschl » Tue Mar 07, 2017 2:07 pm

Correct. If you are doing security, unarmed or armed, you have to be licensed by the state. Level 2 security is (unarmed) non commissioned security officer.
Ron
NRA Member


SewTexas
Senior Member
Posts: 2732
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 11:52 pm
Location: San Antonio area

Re: HB421

Postby SewTexas » Tue Mar 07, 2017 2:09 pm

rtschl wrote:Correct. If you are doing security, unarmed or armed, you have to be licensed by the state. Level 2 security is (unarmed) non commissioned security officer.



I thought we'd figured out that it was only armed....
Although I'm still trying to figure out what right the state has to tell churches what to do within the church.
~Tracy
Gun control is what you talk about when you don't want to talk about the truth ~ Colion Noir

User avatar

Flightmare
Senior Member
Posts: 1175
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2016 7:00 pm
Location: Plano, TX

Re: HB421

Postby Flightmare » Tue Mar 07, 2017 2:15 pm

SewTexas wrote:
rtschl wrote:Correct. If you are doing security, unarmed or armed, you have to be licensed by the state. Level 2 security is (unarmed) non commissioned security officer.



I thought we'd figured out that it was only armed....
Although I'm still trying to figure out what right the state has to tell churches what to do within the church.


I agree that it's silly that a volunteer "security" team should be regulated by the state. Unfortunately, it's difficult if not impossible for some small churches to be able to afford this, and still continue their work. I know at my small church, we have no security team. There are some members who are police, and several are LTCs who carry. But there is no official security team, and I believe that the law that HB 421 is attempting to fix is why.
Deplorable lunatic since 2016

User avatar

thatguyoverthere
Senior Member
Posts: 249
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2015 11:51 pm
Location: Fannin County

Re: HB421

Postby thatguyoverthere » Tue Mar 07, 2017 2:33 pm

Someone please educate me.

I just looked over 1702 (granted, quickly skimmed over it) and I did not see anything that would prohibit a person acting as an unpaid volunteer security person for a church. All I saw was references to being a paid employee in that position.

Obviously I'm missing something. Someone please tell me what specific paragraph(s) in the code currently prohibits a church member (or members) from simply walking around inside and/or outside a church just watching for trouble?


SewTexas
Senior Member
Posts: 2732
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 11:52 pm
Location: San Antonio area

Re: HB421

Postby SewTexas » Tue Mar 07, 2017 2:34 pm

Flightmare wrote:
SewTexas wrote:
rtschl wrote:Correct. If you are doing security, unarmed or armed, you have to be licensed by the state. Level 2 security is (unarmed) non commissioned security officer.



I thought we'd figured out that it was only armed....
Although I'm still trying to figure out what right the state has to tell churches what to do within the church.


I agree that it's silly that a volunteer "security" team should be regulated by the state. Unfortunately, it's difficult if not impossible for some small churches to be able to afford this, and still continue their work. I know at my small church, we have no security team. There are some members who are police, and several are LTCs who carry. But there is no official security team, and I believe that the law that HB 421 is attempting to fix is why.



yes, it looks like he's trying to fix it. But it sounded at the end, as he was trying to wrap up, that Renaldi, himself, was confused. I'm not sure if anyone else heard that as well? Maybe I was confused at that point, I had missed the early testimony so that might have been part of it. But if he doesn't understand all of the law that is involved, that's going to be a problem.
~Tracy
Gun control is what you talk about when you don't want to talk about the truth ~ Colion Noir

User avatar

rtschl
Senior Member
Posts: 567
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 1:50 pm
Location: Fort Worth

Re: HB421

Postby rtschl » Tue Mar 07, 2017 2:43 pm

thatguyoverthere wrote:Someone please educate me.

I just looked over 1702 (granted, quickly skimmed over it) and I did not see anything that would prohibit a person acting as an unpaid volunteer security person for a church. All I saw was references to being a paid employee in that position.

Obviously I'm missing something. Someone please tell me what specific paragraph(s) in the code currently prohibits a church member (or members) from simply walking around inside and/or outside a church just watching for trouble?


DPS Private Security Bureau (PSB) gave an opinion in 2007 as such: https://www.dps.texas.gov/rsd/psb/Laws/psb_opin_sum.htm and has also been discussed here on the forum many times - one such is here: http://texaschlforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=64221

According to PSB: A volunteer security patrol made up of church members would generally require licensing under the provisions of Section 1702.108 or 1702.222, regardless of whether any compensation is received as a result of the activities. The only exception to licensing provided by the legislature for nonprofit and civic organizations is found in Section 1702.327, which applies specifically to nonprofit and civic organizations that employ peace officers under certain circumstances and would not be applicable here.
Ron
NRA Member

User avatar

thatguyoverthere
Senior Member
Posts: 249
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2015 11:51 pm
Location: Fannin County

Re: HB421

Postby thatguyoverthere » Tue Mar 07, 2017 2:56 pm

rtschl wrote:
thatguyoverthere wrote:Someone please educate me.

I just looked over 1702 (granted, quickly skimmed over it) and I did not see anything that would prohibit a person acting as an unpaid volunteer security person for a church. All I saw was references to being a paid employee in that position.

Obviously I'm missing something. Someone please tell me what specific paragraph(s) in the code currently prohibits a church member (or members) from simply walking around inside and/or outside a church just watching for trouble?


DPS Private Security Bureau (PSB) gave an opinion in 2007 as such: https://www.dps.texas.gov/rsd/psb/Laws/psb_opin_sum.htm and has also been discussed here on the forum many times - one such is here: http://texaschlforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=64221

According to PSB: A volunteer security patrol made up of church members would generally require licensing under the provisions of Section 1702.108 or 1702.222, regardless of whether any compensation is received as a result of the activities. The only exception to licensing provided by the legislature for nonprofit and civic organizations is found in Section 1702.327, which applies specifically to nonprofit and civic organizations that employ peace officers under certain circumstances and would not be applicable here.


Ok, thank you, Ron. I was unaware of the background because I was previously not in a situation to have a need to know about any of this, whereas I am more so now. Thanks for catching me up.

We need this bill!


gugisman
Junior Member
Posts: 41
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2013 10:47 am

Re: HB421

Postby gugisman » Tue Mar 07, 2017 8:27 pm

It was a good day for churches, I think.

One of the guys presented a letter he received from the author of the May 10, 2007 DOJ opinion, re: Volunteer Church Security members being under authority of TX OC1702. The letter apparently clarifies that the May 10 2007 letter is advisory only and non-binding. Does anyone have a copy to share here?

Also, the person who originally posed the question to DOJ was the owner of Guardian (church security company), Chuck Chadwick, who said so when presenting testimony against the bill.

User avatar

sbrawley
Senior Member
Posts: 632
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2014 11:32 pm
Location: Lubbock

Re: HB421

Postby sbrawley » Tue Mar 07, 2017 9:32 pm

I enjoyed the part where the gentleman argued that the law violated the first amendment causing the chairman to take that into consideration.
When government takes away citizens' right to bear arms, it becomes citizens' duty to take away government's right to govern
Unknown
2015 NRA Lifetime Member


ninjabread
Senior Member
Posts: 230
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2017 7:12 pm

Re: HB421

Postby ninjabread » Thu Mar 09, 2017 7:23 pm

sbrawley wrote:I enjoyed the part where the gentleman argued that the law violated the first amendment causing the chairman to take that into consideration.

There's a good argument HB421 violates the first amendment. Treating a religious organization differently than a non-religious organization is literally religious discrimination.

Unfortunately for the Paul Blart Lobby, there is a simple fix to that flaw. :reddevil
This is my opinion. There are many like it, but this one is mine.


gugisman
Junior Member
Posts: 41
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2013 10:47 am

Re: HB421 Church Volunteer Security

Postby gugisman » Tue May 30, 2017 10:45 pm

That "gentleman" was me, thank you. ;-)


Return to “2017 Legislative Wish List”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest