2017 Legislative Priorities

This is the forum for topics directly related to desired changes in the upcoming legislative session.

Moderator: carlson1


artx
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 220
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2007 8:14 pm
Location: SATX

Re: 2017 Legislative Priorities

#16

Post by artx »

I'm beyond excited to see the effort to remove dangerous off limits locations :)
User avatar

TexasJohnBoy
Banned
Posts in topic: 7
Posts: 1999
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2015 4:21 pm
Location: North Texas

Re: 2017 Legislative Priorities

#17

Post by TexasJohnBoy »

Removal of any area (other than child care/primary/secondary school) from the 'off-limits' list on public college campuses. These are publicly owned institutions, why are they treated any differently than public city owned property that cannot post 30.06/07? Any prohibited areas should be defined in the penal code and not left to become a confusing patchwork of rules and policies differing at each and every campus in the state.
TSRA Member since 5/30/15; NRA Member since 10/31/14
User avatar

TexasJohnBoy
Banned
Posts in topic: 7
Posts: 1999
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2015 4:21 pm
Location: North Texas

Re: 2017 Legislative Priorities

#18

Post by TexasJohnBoy »

artx wrote:I'm beyond excited to see the effort to remove dangerous off limits locations :)
:iagree:
TSRA Member since 5/30/15; NRA Member since 10/31/14

rotor
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 3326
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 11:26 pm

Re: 2017 Legislative Priorities

#19

Post by rotor »

artx wrote:I'm beyond excited to see the effort to remove dangerous off limits locations :)
Dumb question but what is a dangerous off limits location?
User avatar

AJSully421
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 1436
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 4:31 pm
Location: SW Fort Worth

Re: 2017 Legislative Priorities

#20

Post by AJSully421 »

rotor wrote:
artx wrote:I'm beyond excited to see the effort to remove dangerous off limits locations :)
Dumb question but what is a dangerous off limits location?
Anywhere where you cannot carry your pistol is a "dangerous off limits location".

Especially "known gun free zones". It has been proven that mass shooters specifically look for gun free zones to try to maximize their body counts because they know that no one will be able to stop them quickly.

Don't think that groups like isis will not be looking for the same thing if they are making plans to do something like the Westgate Mall attack, but here in Texas. Malls posted 30.06/7 are insanely dangerous. What better place to go on a disarmed victim shooting spree than a posted mall?

Similarly, everyone knows that you can attack unarmed folks at a polling place, race track, bar, courthouse (or right outside the courthouse) schools, private colleges, many think that churches are all off limits.
"The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant, it's just that they know so much that isn't so." - Ronald Reagan, 1964

30.06 signs only make criminals and terrorists safer.

NRA, LTC, School Safety, Armed Security, & Body Guard Instructor
User avatar

Lynyrd
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1536
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2016 10:20 am
Location: East Texas

Re: 2017 Legislative Priorities

#21

Post by Lynyrd »

I tried not to post this, but I just can't stop. :biggrinjester:

If Bernie gets elected every LTC holder gets a free 1911. "rlol" "rlol"
Do what you say you're gonna do.

rotor
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 3326
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 11:26 pm

Re: 2017 Legislative Priorities

#22

Post by rotor »

AJSully421 wrote:
rotor wrote:
artx wrote:I'm beyond excited to see the effort to remove dangerous off limits locations :)
Dumb question but what is a dangerous off limits location?
Anywhere where you cannot carry your pistol is a "dangerous off limits location".

Especially "known gun free zones". It has been proven that mass shooters specifically look for gun free zones to try to maximize their body counts because they know that no one will be able to stop them quickly.

Don't think that groups like isis will not be looking for the same thing if they are making plans to do something like the Westgate Mall attack, but here in Texas. Malls posted 30.06/7 are insanely dangerous. What better place to go on a disarmed victim shooting spree than a posted mall?

Similarly, everyone knows that you can attack unarmed folks at a polling place, race track, bar, courthouse (or right outside the courthouse) schools, private colleges, many think that churches are all off limits.
Thank you. Just hadn't heard the saying in that way. I agree.
User avatar

Charles L. Cotton
Site Admin
Posts in topic: 18
Posts: 17787
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:31 pm
Location: Friendswood, TX
Contact:

Re: 2017 Legislative Priorities

#23

Post by Charles L. Cotton »

When I say off-limits areas are dangerous, I mean to the unarmed LTC. I also agree strongly with 30.06 signs, but that's private property and I'm focusing on statutorily off-limits areas.

Chas.
User avatar

rtschl
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1257
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 1:50 pm
Location: Fort Worth

Re: 2017 Legislative Priorities

#24

Post by rtschl »

I see one major obstacle that can be summed up in two words:

Joe Straus

:banghead:
Ron
NRA Member
User avatar

RoyGBiv
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 9514
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:41 am
Location: Fort Worth

Re: 2017 Legislative Priorities

#25

Post by RoyGBiv »

Charles L. Cotton wrote:Top priority - Remove all unnecessary and dangerous off-limits areas for LTCs. The only exception should be courtrooms when the LTC is a party or witness to an ongoing case.

Chas.
I'll salute that.... :txflag:
I am not a lawyer. This is NOT legal advice.!
Nothing tempers idealism quite like the cold bath of reality.... SQLGeek

amtank
Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 87
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2015 4:46 pm

Re: 2017 Legislative Priorities

#26

Post by amtank »

rtschl wrote:I see one major obstacle that can be summed up in two words:

Joe Straus

:banghead:
Surely you don't mean NRA-PVF endorsed Speaker of the House Joe Straus he has an A rating....
User avatar

troglodyte
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 1314
Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2004 4:16 pm
Location: Hockley County
Contact:

Re: 2017 Legislative Priorities

#27

Post by troglodyte »

I'd like to add clearing up the volunteer church volunteer security issues.

There is precedence now that schools are openly posting they have armed faculty and staff and will defend their students. Some schools pay stipends for firearms, ammo, and training but the personnel are not licensed security guards. Other schools just allow the employees to carry if they so choose.

I don't see why a volunteer group at churches is any different.

No uniforms, badges, or tiaras, just church members watching over the flock.
User avatar

troglodyte
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 1314
Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2004 4:16 pm
Location: Hockley County
Contact:

Re: 2017 Legislative Priorities

#28

Post by troglodyte »

Charles L. Cotton wrote:
Educational institution should be removed from the Penal Code. Only primary and secondary schools should be in §46.03 and LTCs should be excepted.
Chas.
I really wish we had a "Like" button.

:iagree:
User avatar

TexasJohnBoy
Banned
Posts in topic: 7
Posts: 1999
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2015 4:21 pm
Location: North Texas

Re: 2017 Legislative Priorities

#29

Post by TexasJohnBoy »

I'd actually really like to see a bill similar to other states that attempts to void federal gun control and prohibit enforcement of said controls by state agencies.

This may be pie in the sky, but I definitely think that this will be something that we may want to have on the books depending on how the election and subsequent supreme court nominees shake out.

http://shallnot.org/virginia-bill-would ... the-state/
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/investigati ... ws-n185326
TSRA Member since 5/30/15; NRA Member since 10/31/14
Locked

Return to “2017 Legislative Wish List”