Poll

This forum is for general legislative discussions not specific to any given legislative session. It will remain open.

Moderator: carlson1

Will Hillary Clinton be indicted criminally by the DOJ on charges pertaining to her email scandal?

Yes
18
18%
No
84
82%
 
Total votes: 102

User avatar

Topic author
safety1
Senior Member
Posts: 589
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2010 8:13 am

Poll

Postby safety1 » Wed Mar 09, 2016 8:44 am

.
We must reject the idea that every time a law’s broken, society is guilty rather than the lawbreaker. It is time to restore the American precept that each individual is accountable for his actions. ~ Ronald Reagan ~
NRA - Life Member

User avatar

RPBrown
Senior Member
Posts: 4001
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 11:56 am
Location: Irving, Texas

Re: Poll

Postby RPBrown » Wed Mar 09, 2016 8:50 am

I posted no. There should be a "Yes, But" button. Even if she is indicted and convicted, brother Obama will pardon her so it becomes a non issue.
NRA-Life member
TSRA-Life member
Image


uthornsfan
Senior Member
Posts: 390
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 11:13 pm
Location: Austin, TX

Re: Poll

Postby uthornsfan » Wed Mar 09, 2016 8:50 am

A few follow ups.

I dont think she will.

I think she should.

It won't happen under the current administration.

User avatar

Topic author
safety1
Senior Member
Posts: 589
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2010 8:13 am

Re: Poll

Postby safety1 » Wed Mar 09, 2016 8:52 am

I agree with that RP, but....She would have to be convicted first to be pardoned...Hoping he don't have enough
time in office left to do that. :banghead:
We must reject the idea that every time a law’s broken, society is guilty rather than the lawbreaker. It is time to restore the American precept that each individual is accountable for his actions. ~ Ronald Reagan ~
NRA - Life Member

User avatar

parabelum
Senior Member
Posts: 1835
Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2015 12:22 pm

Re: Poll

Postby parabelum » Wed Mar 09, 2016 8:57 am

My vote was "NO" because the lawless oligarchs are above the law...for now at least.
III%

User avatar

Bitter Clinger
Senior Member
Posts: 1678
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 5:16 pm
Location: North Dallas

Re: Poll

Postby Bitter Clinger » Wed Mar 09, 2016 11:36 am

"You may all go to Chicago, and I will go to Texas." - Davy Crockett
"Fast is fine, but accuracy is everything." - Wyatt Earp
NRA Life Member
לעולם לא תשכח


AF-Odin
Senior Member
Posts: 272
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 7:00 pm
Location: Near Fort Hood

Re: Poll

Postby AF-Odin » Wed Mar 09, 2016 11:42 am

Fully agree with most of the posters. She SHOULD, but will not. :grumble
AF-Odin
Texas LTC Instructor
NRA Pistol, Home Firearms Safety, Personal Protection in the Home Instructor
NRA & TSRA Life Member

User avatar

TangoX-ray
Member
Posts: 168
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2016 4:10 pm
Location: Harris/Galveston County

Re: Poll

Postby TangoX-ray » Wed Mar 09, 2016 11:52 am

Yes, but not before 1/20/2017, so, effectively, no.
Native Texan :txflag: Philippians 2:3-4

"We don't rise to the level of our expectations, we fall to the level of our training." - Archiloches (650 BC)

User avatar

TexasJohnBoy
Senior Member
Posts: 1758
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2015 4:21 pm
Location: North Texas

Re: Poll

Postby TexasJohnBoy » Wed Mar 09, 2016 12:00 pm

Yes.*


The asterisk is extremely important.
TSRA Member since 5/30/15; NRA Member since 10/31/14

User avatar

The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts: 22858
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: Poll

Postby The Annoyed Man » Wed Mar 09, 2016 12:04 pm

uthornsfan wrote:A few follow ups.

I dont think she will.

I think she should.

It won't happen under the current administration.

  • It won't happen under a Sanders administration. (Democrats don't prosecute democrats for crimes.)
  • It won't happen under a Clinton administration. (Democrats don't allow themselves to be subjected to prosecution.)
  • It won't happen under a Trump administration. (He thought she made a great SecState.)
  • The odds of someone else's administration getting elected are approaching zero.

She's going to get away with it.

Here's why: because American voters are dumber than a bag of hammers, and they don't care what slime happens in DC so long as they get their pork and handouts. They've been bought and paid for.
"Give me Liberty, or I'll get up and get it myself."—Hookalakah Meshobbab
"I don't carry because of the odds, I carry because of the stakes."—The Annoyed Boy
"Id aegre et in omnibus semper."—Quod Homo Aegre

User avatar

Bitter Clinger
Senior Member
Posts: 1678
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 5:16 pm
Location: North Dallas

Re: Poll

Postby Bitter Clinger » Wed Mar 09, 2016 1:08 pm

Here's why: because American voters are dumber than a bag of hammers, and they don't care what slime happens in DC so long as they get their pork and handouts. They've been bought and paid for.


Image
"You may all go to Chicago, and I will go to Texas." - Davy Crockett
"Fast is fine, but accuracy is everything." - Wyatt Earp
NRA Life Member
לעולם לא תשכח

User avatar

Pawpaw
Senior Member
Posts: 5484
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 11:16 am
Location: Hunt County

Re: Poll

Postby Pawpaw » Wed Mar 09, 2016 6:15 pm

The Annoyed Man wrote:
  • It won't happen under a Sanders administration. (Democrats don't prosecute democrats for crimes.)
  • It won't happen under a Clinton administration. (Democrats don't allow themselves to be subjected to prosecution.)
  • It won't happen under a Trump administration. (He thought she made a great SecState.)
  • The odds of someone else's administration getting elected are approaching zero.

She's going to get away with it.

Here's why: because American voters are dumber than a bag of hammers, and they don't care what slime happens in DC so long as they get their pork and handouts. They've been bought and paid for.

QFT
Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence. - John Adams

NRA Benefactor Life Member

User avatar

dale blanker
Senior Member
Posts: 284
Joined: Sat May 02, 2015 1:49 am
Location: central Texas

Re: Poll

Postby dale blanker » Tue Mar 15, 2016 1:15 am

No, there appears to be no criminal act. Private email use had been done by others in both parties with impunity.

It's just gotten more visibility from our Select Benghazi Committee who is probably setting a new world record for time and cost in investigating something. And it's really mainly about "talking points" - like we should know within days the detail about an event in Libya - really?

No wonder Trump is doing so well... Trump has said that Hillary should be punished more severely than General Petraeus who received only a probation and fine. Remember that the General deliberately distributed material to his girlfriend - hardly comparable to Hillary's thing as we know it. Petraeus should have lost all benefits and maybe spent a little time in confinement.
Patriotism is supporting your country all the time
and your government when it deserves it. Mark Twain

User avatar

Topic author
safety1
Senior Member
Posts: 589
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2010 8:13 am

Re: Poll

Postby safety1 » Thu Mar 17, 2016 8:56 am

dale blanker wrote:No, there appears to be no criminal act. Private email use had been done by others in both parties with impunity.

It's just gotten more visibility from our Select Benghazi Committee who is probably setting a new world record for time and cost in investigating something. And it's really mainly about "talking points" - like we should know within days the detail about an event in Libya - really?

No wonder Trump is doing so well... Trump has said that Hillary should be punished more severely than General Petraeus who received only a probation and fine. Remember that the General deliberately distributed material to his girlfriend - hardly comparable to Hillary's thing as we know it. Petraeus should have lost all benefits and maybe spent a little time in confinement.



I have to disagree, somebody ordered setting up a private server. This was a deliberate act and it compromised national security...regardless if anything was actually compromised or not. The laws regarding the handling of classified information are very clearly written. The material is deemed classified at the time it was created, even if it is not marked as such. The originator of the material has final say over classification, this is why one should not use a unsecured email source, as she did. If private email accounts have been used by others, regardless of what party, I think they should also be investigated. It's not political to me, its about the highest roles of leadership in this country being held accountable....just as you and I would be.
We must reject the idea that every time a law’s broken, society is guilty rather than the lawbreaker. It is time to restore the American precept that each individual is accountable for his actions. ~ Ronald Reagan ~
NRA - Life Member

User avatar

Pariah3j
Senior Member
Posts: 809
Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2015 5:03 pm
Location: Webster

Re: Poll

Postby Pariah3j » Thu Mar 17, 2016 12:02 pm

uthornsfan wrote:A few follow ups.

I dont think she will.

I think she should.

It won't happen under the current administration.


:iagree: Took the words right out of my mouth.
"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny" - Thomas Jefferson


Return to “General Legislative Discussions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest