Re: Are White Gun Owners Protecting the Second Amendment or Their Racial Interest?
Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 8:41 am
Odd. I always thought gun control was racist with Texas Reconstruction era gun laws being a prime example.
The focal point for Texas firearms information and discussions
http://texaschlforum.com/
There is a difference between "annoying man" and "man who is annoyed". I'm guessing "Un hombre que está molesto" would please TAM more.bblhd672 wrote:Hombre Molesto?The Annoyed Man wrote: Funny....I don't feel Hispanic....
Beiruty wrote:2nd is for all. Constitution says, "We the people", the 2ndA says the "right of the people"
What is not clear?
Unlike TAM (i.e. Not wanting to appear hetero-normative or specify gender), I prefer the term Latin(x) of pallor... Or less politically correctly... El juero.chasfm11 wrote:There is a difference between "annoying man" and "man who is annoyed". I'm guessing "Un hombre que está molesto" would please TAM more.bblhd672 wrote:Hombre Molesto?The Annoyed Man wrote: Funny....I don't feel Hispanic....
That's what I get for using Google Translate to attempt humor in another language. Sorry TAM. I'm sure only people with short attention spans find you annoying.chasfm11 wrote:There is a difference between "annoying man" and "man who is annoyed". I'm guessing "Un hombre que está molesto" would please TAM more.bblhd672 wrote:Hombre Molesto?The Annoyed Man wrote: Funny....I don't feel Hispanic....