Ktashford wrote:It's not a private entity though. It's a publicly owned company. And I tried to find all the requirements for a company to be able to have 30.06 signs and I don't see that they meet any. Not saying I'm 100% correct. I could have missed something. But why don't they have a legit 30.06 sign? I've never seen a 30.6. I know it's a tiny detail but to my knowledge, 30.06 and 30.6 are 2 different regulations. Or am I wrong?
Publicly owned companies are private entities; they are just not privately held. That's a different concept. Publicly owned companies are free to post 30.06 and 30.07 signs, just as you and I are.
As to 30.6 instead of 30.06, if I were in there by accident and got caught and prosecuted, I might try to defend on that basis, but I would not knowingly go in planning to depend on that defense.
In the unlikely event that I got caught, I'd ask for a jury trial in municipal or JP court and submit multiple motions to the (part time) municipal prosecutor to dismiss. If they didn't drop, I'd take it all the way through voir dire
and trial by jury, at which time the jury of my peers may find me guilty (of wasting their time), and assess the maximum $200 fine...I would then immediately appeal...and proceed until I ran out of money to pay my lawyer.
4/13/1996 Completed CHL Class, 4/16/1996 Fingerprints, Affidavits, and Application Mailed, 10/4/1996 Received CHL, renewed 1998, 2002, 2006, 2011, 2016...). "ATF... Uhhh...heh...heh....Alcohol, tobacco, and GUNS!! Cool!!!!"