S&W M&P M2.0 9mm Range Report

Gun, shooting and equipment discussions unrelated to CHL issues

Moderator: carlson1

Post Reply
User avatar

Topic author
bblhd672
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 4811
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 10:43 am
Location: TX

S&W M&P M2.0 9mm Range Report

#1

Post by bblhd672 »

Took my new M&P 2.0 FDE 5" barrel model to the range on Saturday. Love it! The difference in recoil between a full size 9mm and my Shield is fantastic.

Shot qty 4 17 round mags of Remington UMC to start, no ammo issues. After first few shots getting used to the trigger pull and recoil, I was able to start making a big hole in center target at 5, 7 and 10 feet. Switched ammo to Winchester USA Forged steel case and shot about 40 rounds - had one failure to feed, but still hitting center of target. Next ammo up was Winchester USA brass case in a 100 pack- shot about 50 rounds - had one misfire, but accuracy was still good. Switch to Blazer Brass and had no issues. All bullets were 115grain.

Overall I am thrilled with my purchase of this gun. The trigger is very smooth and it shoots very accurately. Much easier to shoot this full size than the Shield. Looking forward to S&W releasing a M2.0 Compact model!
The left lies about everything. Truth is a liberal value, and truth is a conservative value, but it has never been a left-wing value. People on the left say whatever advances their immediate agenda. Power is their moral lodestar; therefore, truth is always subservient to it. - Dennis Prager
User avatar

puma guy
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 7631
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 2:23 pm
Location: Near San Jacinto

Re: S&W M&P M2.0 9mm Range Report

#2

Post by puma guy »

Thank you for the report. Can you offer details on the misfire?
KAHR PM40/Hoffner IWB and S&W Mod 60/ Galco IWB
NRA Endowment Member, TSRA Life Member,100 Club Life Member,TFC Member
My Faith, My Gun and My Constitution: I cling to all three!
User avatar

Topic author
bblhd672
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 4811
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 10:43 am
Location: TX

Re: S&W M&P M2.0 9mm Range Report

#3

Post by bblhd672 »

puma guy wrote:Thank you for the report. Can you offer details on the misfire?
Nice dimple on the primer - no bang.
The left lies about everything. Truth is a liberal value, and truth is a conservative value, but it has never been a left-wing value. People on the left say whatever advances their immediate agenda. Power is their moral lodestar; therefore, truth is always subservient to it. - Dennis Prager
User avatar

puma guy
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 7631
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 2:23 pm
Location: Near San Jacinto

Re: S&W M&P M2.0 9mm Range Report

#4

Post by puma guy »

bblhd672 wrote:
puma guy wrote:Thank you for the report. Can you offer details on the misfire?
Nice dimple on the primer - no bang.
Curious if you retried it.
KAHR PM40/Hoffner IWB and S&W Mod 60/ Galco IWB
NRA Endowment Member, TSRA Life Member,100 Club Life Member,TFC Member
My Faith, My Gun and My Constitution: I cling to all three!

cmgee67
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1914
Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2015 2:45 pm

Re: S&W M&P M2.0 9mm Range Report

#5

Post by cmgee67 »

Glad to hear a decent report. I held one of these at a gun show last week and it felt good but is the trigger better than the original? I really want to like the m&p series of pistols but the trigger and the fact that every time I have used one I have had several FTF and FTE's and that was in a clean lubed gun. That why I stick with glock. 2k through my 19 and not any issue ever. But I love the looks of the M&p and the colors and the way they feel in hand but just can't get over my hiccups I've had with them
User avatar

Topic author
bblhd672
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 4811
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 10:43 am
Location: TX

Re: S&W M&P M2.0 9mm Range Report

#6

Post by bblhd672 »

puma guy wrote:
bblhd672 wrote:
puma guy wrote:Thank you for the report. Can you offer details on the misfire?
Nice dimple on the primer - no bang.
Curious if you retried it.
Yes - same result.
The left lies about everything. Truth is a liberal value, and truth is a conservative value, but it has never been a left-wing value. People on the left say whatever advances their immediate agenda. Power is their moral lodestar; therefore, truth is always subservient to it. - Dennis Prager
User avatar

Topic author
bblhd672
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 4811
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 10:43 am
Location: TX

Re: S&W M&P M2.0 9mm Range Report

#7

Post by bblhd672 »

cmgee67 wrote:Glad to hear a decent report. I held one of these at a gun show last week and it felt good but is the trigger better than the original? I really want to like the m&p series of pistols but the trigger and the fact that every time I have used one I have had several FTF and FTE's and that was in a clean lubed gun. That why I stick with glock. 2k through my 19 and not any issue ever. But I love the looks of the M&p and the colors and the way they feel in hand but just can't get over my hiccups I've had with them
I don't have any experience with the 1.0 trigger so can't compare. However, on the Smith-Wesson forum people who have shot both say the M2.0 trigger is better than the original.
The left lies about everything. Truth is a liberal value, and truth is a conservative value, but it has never been a left-wing value. People on the left say whatever advances their immediate agenda. Power is their moral lodestar; therefore, truth is always subservient to it. - Dennis Prager
User avatar

Topic author
bblhd672
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 4811
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 10:43 am
Location: TX

Re: S&W M&P M2.0 9mm Range Report

#8

Post by bblhd672 »

Used my M2.0 at handgun class yesterday- put approximately 500 rounds through it with zero malfunctions.

Both instructors shot it and said it was great improvement over the model 1 M&P.

Only issue I experienced was accidentally engaging the manual safety when drawing or holstering. The safety detents could be a bit deeper. I may end up removing the manual safety as many on the SW forums recommend.
The left lies about everything. Truth is a liberal value, and truth is a conservative value, but it has never been a left-wing value. People on the left say whatever advances their immediate agenda. Power is their moral lodestar; therefore, truth is always subservient to it. - Dennis Prager
User avatar

Bitter Clinger
Banned
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 2593
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 5:16 pm
Location: North Dallas

Re: S&W M&P M2.0 9mm Range Report

#9

Post by Bitter Clinger »

cmgee67 wrote:Glad to hear a decent report. I held one of these at a gun show last week and it felt good but is the trigger better than the original? I really want to like the m&p series of pistols but the trigger and the fact that every time I have used one I have had several FTF and FTE's and that was in a clean lubed gun.
That why I stick with glock.
2k through my 19 and not any issue ever. But I love the looks of the M&p and the colors and the way they feel in hand but just can't get over my hiccups I've had with them
Really? I hope that Glock comment was tongue in cheek? Cause it sure lacks any data to back it up!

YMMV, but I was on the same range, shooting the same course of fire as the OP, and running CCI Blazer Brass through a couple of Glock 19's.

I had several FTF's as a function of hard primers, some of which would function when I tried them a second time, and some that simply would not. I also noticed (anecdotally) that the lot of CCI Blazer that I was running also seemed "dirtier" than prior lots.

So the OP had no problem with Blazer in his S&W, I had a more than the usual amount of FTF's with Blazer in my Glocks. Is the gun, or the ammo? What's in your magazine? :waiting:
"You may all go to H3ll, and I will go to Texas." - Davy Crockett
"Fast is fine, but accuracy is everything." - Wyatt Earp
NRA Life Member
לעולם לא תשכח
Post Reply

Return to “General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion”