Loading 165 grain 9mm

For those who like to roll their own.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

Post Reply

Topic author
thatguy
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 521
Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 6:56 am
Location: League City
Contact:

Loading 165 grain 9mm

#1

Post by thatguy »

Any data on Xtreme Bullets 165 grain 9mm with Titegroup powder? So far I'm at 3.2 grains of TG, 1.15 COAL which pushes 850 fps but I'd like to estimate the case pressure, any suggestions.
In the endless pursuit of perfection, we may achieve excellence.

Texas LTC and School Safety Instructor and NRA Training Counselor

K-Texas
Banned
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 341
Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2017 2:34 pm
Location: Heart of Texas

Re: Loading 165 grain 9mm

#2

Post by K-Texas »

Provided that Quik-Load has 165 gr. bullets in the database, that's likely as close as you'll get without an actual pressure test of a handload. As far as minor power factor at say 130 with a bit of cushion, you only need 788 FPS to do that.

Now, who here has Quik-Load on their computer? ;-)
Anything that can be corrupted by man; will be corrupted.

The Lord is my shepherd; I shall not want . . .

flechero
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 3486
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 5:04 pm
Location: Central Texas

Re: Loading 165 grain 9mm

#3

Post by flechero »

Good info here including Quickload data, brass specifics, etc. on the 165 Xtreme and other heavies. Also in my googling- I saw lots of reported use of N-310, as you probably have.

https://www.shootingtimes.com/editorial ... uger/99514

ETA: at 3.2gr TG you are likely way over pressure... the QL data put 2.7 gr TG in the +P range.

Be careful and have fun! :tiphat:

Topic author
thatguy
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 521
Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 6:56 am
Location: League City
Contact:

Re: Loading 165 grain 9mm

#4

Post by thatguy »

I saw that as well but I also found on the Hodgdon website that the 147 grain at 1.10 COAL is loaded with 3.2 to 3.6 at 22,500 to 27,500 CUP respectively. Of course the CUP vs PSI lead me down another rabbit-hole all together however, I put the 165 grain at 1.15 COAL which should be close to the same chamber space..? In addition I've actually ran about 35,000 of these rounds through my Glocks with no issues so far. :fire I'm just trying to verify if anyone else has. :mrgreen:

Thank you for your time and research.
In the endless pursuit of perfection, we may achieve excellence.

Texas LTC and School Safety Instructor and NRA Training Counselor
User avatar

SQLGeek
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 3269
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 1:48 am
Location: Richmond, TX

Re: Loading 165 grain 9mm

#5

Post by SQLGeek »

K-Texas wrote: Wed Apr 08, 2020 8:07 pm

Now, who here has Quik-Load on their computer? ;-)
I'm not dedicated enough to reloading to build a Windows machine. :lol:
Psalm 91:2

K-Texas
Banned
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 341
Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2017 2:34 pm
Location: Heart of Texas

Re: Loading 165 grain 9mm

#6

Post by K-Texas »

thatguy wrote: Fri Apr 10, 2020 7:13 am I saw that as well but I also found on the Hodgdon website that the 147 grain at 1.10 COAL is loaded with 3.2 to 3.6 at 22,500 to 27,500 CUP respectively. Of course the CUP vs PSI lead me down another rabbit-hole all together however, I put the 165 grain at 1.15 COAL which should be close to the same chamber space..? In addition I've actually ran about 35,000 of these rounds through my Glocks with no issues so far. :fire I'm just trying to verify if anyone else has. :mrgreen:

Thank you for your time and research.
There are two different test methods recognized by SAAMI for Max Average Pressure, or MAP, for the 9 X 19mm: 35,000 PSI and 33,000 CUP. By increasing OACL from 1.100" to 1.150", pressure will be slightly lower. By how much is dependent on the powder used and the pressure generated at 1.100" OACL. With a very fast burning powder like TiteGroup, the difference will be slight, however. ;-)
Anything that can be corrupted by man; will be corrupted.

The Lord is my shepherd; I shall not want . . .
Post Reply

Return to “Reloading Forum”