Hearing Protection Act of 2017

What's going on in Washington, D.C.?

Moderators: Charles L. Cotton, carlson1

User avatar

anygunanywhere
Senior Member
Posts: 6562
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 9:16 am
Location: La Grange, Texas

Re: Hearing Protection Act of 2017

Postby anygunanywhere » Thu Oct 05, 2017 3:11 pm

ScottDLS wrote:What we really need is a Federal law banning and confiscating autoloader rifles that are not equipped with a rate of fire slowing device (ROFSD), that keeps you from pulling the trigger more than once every two seconds. All existing semi-rifles must be registered IAW NFA after having ROFSD installed. And if you are discovered pulling the trigger of your semi-auto more than once per 2 seconds you will be guilty, you lose your gun and are guilty of a felony. Most responsible ranges already prohibit rapid fire, so this is a simple, common sense, gun law that even the NRA should be able to get behind.

And why does anyone need drum magazines that hold 50 or 100 deadly bullets? These are unnecessary and illegal for deer hunting so they should be banned.


The snark is strong in you.
1911s should be carried openly as God and John Moses Browning (PBUH) intended them to be.
III%


MeMelYup
Senior Member
Posts: 1867
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2010 3:21 pm

Re: Hearing Protection Act of 2017

Postby MeMelYup » Wed Oct 11, 2017 12:51 pm

ScottDLS wrote:What we really need is a Federal law banning and confiscating autoloader rifles that are not equipped with a rate of fire slowing device (ROFSD), that keeps you from pulling the trigger more than once every two seconds. All existing semi-rifles must be registered IAW NFA after having ROFSD installed. And if you are discovered pulling the trigger of your semi-auto more than once per 2 seconds you will be guilty, you lose your gun and are guilty of a felony. Most responsible ranges already prohibit rapid fire, so this is a simple, common sense, gun law that even the NRA should be able to get behind.

And why does anyone need drum magazines that hold 50 or 100 deadly bullets? These are unnecessary and illegal for deer hunting so they should be banned.

A guy and several of his buddies brake into your house wanting anything they can get. Do you want a firearm that will shoot only once every two seconds, or one that will shoot every time you pull the trigger no mater how fast? Would you rather have a five round magazine, or a thirty or sixty? Would you rather have a silencer on your firearm, or a loud ringing in your ears that gets more intense each time you pull the trigger? Not saying the silencer would knockout the noise and ringing, but it would not be as intense, especially with an SRB.


BBYC
Member
Posts: 51
Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2017 12:32 pm

Re: Hearing Protection Act of 2017

Postby BBYC » Wed Oct 11, 2017 1:06 pm

Keep your powder dry.

User avatar

anygunanywhere
Senior Member
Posts: 6562
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 9:16 am
Location: La Grange, Texas

Re: Hearing Protection Act of 2017

Postby anygunanywhere » Wed Oct 11, 2017 1:39 pm

MeMelYup wrote:
ScottDLS wrote:What we really need is a Federal law banning and confiscating autoloader rifles that are not equipped with a rate of fire slowing device (ROFSD), that keeps you from pulling the trigger more than once every two seconds. All existing semi-rifles must be registered IAW NFA after having ROFSD installed. And if you are discovered pulling the trigger of your semi-auto more than once per 2 seconds you will be guilty, you lose your gun and are guilty of a felony. Most responsible ranges already prohibit rapid fire, so this is a simple, common sense, gun law that even the NRA should be able to get behind.

And why does anyone need drum magazines that hold 50 or 100 deadly bullets? These are unnecessary and illegal for deer hunting so they should be banned.

A guy and several of his buddies brake into your house wanting anything they can get. Do you want a firearm that will shoot only once every two seconds, or one that will shoot every time you pull the trigger no mater how fast? Would you rather have a five round magazine, or a thirty or sixty? Would you rather have a silencer on your firearm, or a loud ringing in your ears that gets more intense each time you pull the trigger? Not saying the silencer would knockout the noise and ringing, but it would not be as intense, especially with an SRB.


ScottDLS was being sarcastic.
1911s should be carried openly as God and John Moses Browning (PBUH) intended them to be.
III%

User avatar

canvasbck
Senior Member
Posts: 999
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 9:45 pm
Location: Alvin

Re: Hearing Protection Act of 2017

Postby canvasbck » Wed Oct 11, 2017 2:59 pm

anygunanywhere wrote:
MeMelYup wrote:
ScottDLS wrote:What we really need is a Federal law banning and confiscating autoloader rifles that are not equipped with a rate of fire slowing device (ROFSD), that keeps you from pulling the trigger more than once every two seconds. All existing semi-rifles must be registered IAW NFA after having ROFSD installed. And if you are discovered pulling the trigger of your semi-auto more than once per 2 seconds you will be guilty, you lose your gun and are guilty of a felony. Most responsible ranges already prohibit rapid fire, so this is a simple, common sense, gun law that even the NRA should be able to get behind.

And why does anyone need drum magazines that hold 50 or 100 deadly bullets? These are unnecessary and illegal for deer hunting so they should be banned.

A guy and several of his buddies brake into your house wanting anything they can get. Do you want a firearm that will shoot only once every two seconds, or one that will shoot every time you pull the trigger no mater how fast? Would you rather have a five round magazine, or a thirty or sixty? Would you rather have a silencer on your firearm, or a loud ringing in your ears that gets more intense each time you pull the trigger? Not saying the silencer would knockout the noise and ringing, but it would not be as intense, especially with an SRB.


ScottDLS was being sarcastic.


Sadly, it's difficult to tell the difference between sarcasm and the things that the left actually support.
"All bleeding eventually stops.......quit whining!"

User avatar

ScottDLS
Senior Member
Posts: 3912
Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 1:04 am
Location: DFW Area, TX

Re: Hearing Protection Act of 2017

Postby ScottDLS » Wed Oct 11, 2017 7:23 pm

When my daughter was 6 years old she used to make a ridiculous statement, then follow it loudly with the statement "I'M SARCASTIC!". I just depend on people recognizing my rapier sharp wit and Beavis and Butthead avatar.
4/13/1996 Completed CHL Class, 4/16/1996 Fingerprints, Affidavits, and Application Mailed, 10/4/1996 Received CHL, renewed 1998, 2002, 2006, 2011, 2016...). "ATF... Uhhh...heh...heh....Alcohol, tobacco, and GUNS!! Cool!!!!"

User avatar

anygunanywhere
Senior Member
Posts: 6562
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 9:16 am
Location: La Grange, Texas

Re: Hearing Protection Act of 2017

Postby anygunanywhere » Wed Oct 11, 2017 7:33 pm

ScottDLS wrote:When my daughter was 6 years old she used to make a ridiculous statement, then follow it loudly with the statement "I'M SARCASTIC!". I just depend on people recognizing my rapier sharp wit and Beavis and Butthead avatar.


"rlol"
1911s should be carried openly as God and John Moses Browning (PBUH) intended them to be.
III%


Return to “Federal”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests