Exposing Progressive Corruption and Malfeasance

What's going on in Washington, D.C.?

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar

Topic author
mojo84
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 39
Posts: 9043
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:07 pm
Location: Boerne, TX (Kendall County)

Exposing Progressive Corruption and Malfeasance

#1

Post by mojo84 »

This thread is for WikiLeak information disclosures that expose and shed light on the corrupt progressives.

Email containing information about how much the dems were relying on a Trump nomination. We need to make them pay for this by electing Trump.
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/em ... 8AKdARdAV3


Edited: I changed the title to open it up to other sources that are exposing the progressive liberal criminal, ethic, integrity and character malfeasance such as the Project Veritas videos and others.
Last edited by mojo84 on Tue Oct 18, 2016 8:22 am, edited 3 times in total.
Note: Me sharing a link and information published by others does not constitute my endorsement, agreement, disagreement, my opinion or publishing by me. If you do not like what is contained at a link I share, take it up with the author or publisher of the content.
User avatar

Topic author
mojo84
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 39
Posts: 9043
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:07 pm
Location: Boerne, TX (Kendall County)

Re: WikiLeaks exposing the progressives

#2

Post by mojo84 »

Note: Me sharing a link and information published by others does not constitute my endorsement, agreement, disagreement, my opinion or publishing by me. If you do not like what is contained at a link I share, take it up with the author or publisher of the content.
User avatar

TexasJohnBoy
Banned
Posts in topic: 7
Posts: 1999
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2015 4:21 pm
Location: North Texas

Re: WikiLeaks exposing the progressives

#3

Post by TexasJohnBoy »

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4099
I know when I talk to my friends who are attorneys we are all struggling with what happened to the emails and aren't satisfied with answers to date. While we all know of the occasional use of personal email addresses for business, none of my friends circle can understand how it was viewed as ok/secure/appropriate to use a private server for secure documents AND why further Hillary took it upon herself to review them and delete documents without providing anyone outside her circle a chance to weigh in. It smacks of acting above the law and it smacks of the type of thing I've either gotten discovery sanctions for, fired people for, etc.
TSRA Member since 5/30/15; NRA Member since 10/31/14
User avatar

Topic author
mojo84
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 39
Posts: 9043
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:07 pm
Location: Boerne, TX (Kendall County)

Re: WikiLeaks exposing the progressives

#4

Post by mojo84 »

http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/11/wikil ... -campaign/
The Department of State provided a detailed readout of official email traffic it was about to release in response to Freedom of Information Act requests to Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign.

The emails concerned speeches former President Bill Clinton gave abroad, and did not include any traffic from Hillary Clinton, according to new emails released by WikiLeaks.

“All — DOS is soon releasing another round of documents and email traffic (not hers) in response to Judicial Watch’s FOIA request on DOS’s process for reviewing WJC’s speaking engagements,” Heather Samuelson wrote March 17, 2015. Samuelson has been a Clinton aide since the early 2000s and served as White House liaison during Hillary Clinton’s tenure as secretary of state. Maura Pally and Craig Minassian of the Clinton Foundation; Philippe Reines, a longtime Clinton adviser; press secretary Nick Merrill; communications director Jennifer Palmieri; Cheryl Mills, Clinton’s chief of staff at State; and Tina Flournoy, President Clinton’s former chief of staff, are included on the email.

“It’s 116 pages with approx. 50 sponsor/subsponsor requests,” the email continues. “No objections by DOS in this batch, but some lengthy internal discussions among DOS officials that I highlighted below.”



Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/11/wikil ... z4Mmom7ojI
Note: Me sharing a link and information published by others does not constitute my endorsement, agreement, disagreement, my opinion or publishing by me. If you do not like what is contained at a link I share, take it up with the author or publisher of the content.
User avatar

Topic author
mojo84
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 39
Posts: 9043
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:07 pm
Location: Boerne, TX (Kendall County)

Re: WikiLeaks exposing the progressive's corruption

#5

Post by mojo84 »

The media and citizens are not paying enough attention to what's contained in these email leaks. What we've suspected is being confirm by the information in these emails. It's a high stakes connect the dots.



http://twitter.com/benshapiro/status/785706841158234112
Note: Me sharing a link and information published by others does not constitute my endorsement, agreement, disagreement, my opinion or publishing by me. If you do not like what is contained at a link I share, take it up with the author or publisher of the content.
User avatar

Glockster
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1075
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2014 7:48 am
Location: Kingwood, TX

Re: WikiLeaks exposing the progressive's corruption

#6

Post by Glockster »

Same kind of things that I was referring to in another thread, regarding Ryan using all of this to prepare for a 2020 run. Add to that the newly released emails that show that Clinton herself reviewed and then deleted classified emails. And an announcement this morning about the many RINOs who had been tipped off about the video release. This gets worse every day.
NRA Life Member
My State Rep Hubert won't tell me his position on HB560. How about yours?
User avatar

Topic author
mojo84
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 39
Posts: 9043
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:07 pm
Location: Boerne, TX (Kendall County)

Re: WikiLeaks exposing the progressive's corruption

#7

Post by mojo84 »

http://freebeacon.com/politics/clinton- ... rnie-guns/
She also laid out a strategy for how the campaign should deal with Donald Trump—arguing they should avoid a one-on-one fight with him over gun control at that point. “My theory is that we do not want to be in a one on one with Trump – but want to hit him occasionally,” she said. “In which case, we also need to be hitting Sanders occasionally so we can credibly say we are not only focused on the general.”

Palmieri went on to say that the difference between Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders on gun control, an issue where Hillary ran to the left of Sanders, tested well. She added that the campaign had already planned to use the issue in an upcoming press call.
Note: Me sharing a link and information published by others does not constitute my endorsement, agreement, disagreement, my opinion or publishing by me. If you do not like what is contained at a link I share, take it up with the author or publisher of the content.
User avatar

bblhd672
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 4811
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 10:43 am
Location: TX

Re: WikiLeaks exposing the progressive's corruption

#8

Post by bblhd672 »

And the Clinton campaign's response is not to deny what is being leaked, but to accuse the Russians of acting in consort with Trump.
The left lies about everything. Truth is a liberal value, and truth is a conservative value, but it has never been a left-wing value. People on the left say whatever advances their immediate agenda. Power is their moral lodestar; therefore, truth is always subservient to it. - Dennis Prager
User avatar

Topic author
mojo84
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 39
Posts: 9043
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:07 pm
Location: Boerne, TX (Kendall County)

Re: WikiLeaks exposing the progressive's corruption

#9

Post by mojo84 »

Hillary given heads up about being asked about her position on gun control.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/1881
Note: Me sharing a link and information published by others does not constitute my endorsement, agreement, disagreement, my opinion or publishing by me. If you do not like what is contained at a link I share, take it up with the author or publisher of the content.
User avatar

TexasJohnBoy
Banned
Posts in topic: 7
Posts: 1999
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2015 4:21 pm
Location: North Texas

Re: WikiLeaks exposing the progressive's corruption

#10

Post by TexasJohnBoy »

DOJ and Clinton Campaign in communication during investigation?
http://thehill.com/policy/national-secu ... email-case

The fix has been in for so long, its not even funny any more.

You need some state secrets? Just pay me for a speech!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u-k-UQ95wWc

Image

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/em ... QAS_AWOAZb

It just goes on and on.

ETA: I removed a conspiracy theory image from this post. I can validate half of it, but not that Wasserman Schultz was a co-chair on Clinton's 2012 campaign.

ETA(again): Here we go. Could be a total coincidence...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debbie_Wa ... hultz#2008
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim_Kaine ... .932011.29
Image
TSRA Member since 5/30/15; NRA Member since 10/31/14

jb2012
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1054
Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2015 1:12 pm

Re: WikiLeaks exposing the progressive's corruption

#11

Post by jb2012 »

TexasJohnBoy wrote:
ETA: I removed a conspiracy theory image from this post. I can validate half of it, but not that Wasserman Schultz was a co-chair on Clinton's 2012 campaign.

ETA(again): Here we go. Could be a total coincidence...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debbie_Wa ... hultz#2008
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim_Kaine ... .932011.29
Image
Okay now that's pushing the creepy line imo
User avatar

Topic author
mojo84
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 39
Posts: 9043
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:07 pm
Location: Boerne, TX (Kendall County)

Re: WikiLeaks exposing the progressive's corruption

#12

Post by mojo84 »

Apparently, it takes a village to craft and shape a lie for public release.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5711
> Circling back to this. John, you said you might have ideas on how to edit > the server sentence? Brian just floated whether we should say "I messed up" > instead of "this was a screw-up." What do folks think about that? Other > edits we should make? And then what are next steps here? > > On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 1:40 AM, Dan Schwerin <dschwerin@hillaryclinton.com > > wrote: > >> Made some edits here after chatting with Brian. He thought the "screw >> up" sound bite needed to be less hedged, so I moved the line about >> convenience and previous secretaries elsewhere. He also thought the server >> news should be down with the classified section and given a little set-up. >> Not sure if what i have here does the trick, but check it out. >> Dan >> >> On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 12:50 AM, Dan Schwerin < >> dschwerin@hillaryclinton.com> wrote: >> >>> Here's a draft of a statement that I've worked on with Jake and Jen. See >>> what you think. Have tried to express contrition while not losing >>> perspective.
Note: Me sharing a link and information published by others does not constitute my endorsement, agreement, disagreement, my opinion or publishing by me. If you do not like what is contained at a link I share, take it up with the author or publisher of the content.
User avatar

Topic author
mojo84
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 39
Posts: 9043
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:07 pm
Location: Boerne, TX (Kendall County)

Re: WikiLeaks exposing the progressive's corruption

#13

Post by mojo84 »

Here is the email string discussing how to craft and shape Hillary's story about using the private server.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3300
Note: Me sharing a link and information published by others does not constitute my endorsement, agreement, disagreement, my opinion or publishing by me. If you do not like what is contained at a link I share, take it up with the author or publisher of the content.
User avatar

Topic author
mojo84
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 39
Posts: 9043
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:07 pm
Location: Boerne, TX (Kendall County)

Re: WikiLeaks exposing the progressive's corruption

#14

Post by mojo84 »

Your typical birthday present from a foreign nation.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/8396
QATAR - Would like to see WJC "for five minutes" in NYC, to present $1 million check that Qatar promised for WJC's birthday in 2011.
Note: Me sharing a link and information published by others does not constitute my endorsement, agreement, disagreement, my opinion or publishing by me. If you do not like what is contained at a link I share, take it up with the author or publisher of the content.
User avatar

sjfcontrol
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 6267
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 7:14 am
Location: Flint, TX

Re: WikiLeaks exposing the progressive's corruption

#15

Post by sjfcontrol »

mojo84 wrote:Your typical birthday present from a foreign nation.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/8396
QATAR - Would like to see WJC "for five minutes" in NYC, to present $1 million check that Qatar promised for WJC's birthday in 2011.
2011? Are they going to include 6 years of interest on that million? :smilelol5:
Range Rule: "The front gate lock is not an acceptable target."
Never Forget. Image
Post Reply

Return to “Federal”