In case anyone is looking for SB730 and SB729

Relevant bills filed and their status

Moderator: Charles L. Cotton


Jason73
Senior Member
Posts: 212
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 8:57 pm

Re: In case anyone is looking for SB730 and SB729

Postby Jason73 » Fri May 29, 2009 8:14 am

scott_dfw wrote:I'm game.

Also, I believe an automated FAX every 30 minutes or so...to every representative and senator would be alllmost as annoying as the chubbing.

:txflag:



Just make sure the page you fax is black paper so it eats up all their ink / toner :evil2: "rlol"


scott_dfw
Member
Posts: 62
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2007 3:58 pm
Location: Arlington, TX
Contact:

Re: In case anyone is looking for SB730 and SB729

Postby scott_dfw » Fri May 29, 2009 10:23 am

I did that once back in the old days...to a client that wouldnt pay. And I narrowly beat some kind of criminal mischief charges! :shock:

I taped several pieces of black construction paper together, and taped the ends so it was a big loop. Then faxed it to them. That was in the days of the expensive thermal paper that came in rolls. :evil2:

Anyway, they came in the next morning to find a permanently damaged fax machine, and a roll of completely used thermal paper in a pile on the floor.
(triple checked for profanity)

User avatar

seamusTX
Senior Member
Posts: 13551
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 12:04 pm
Location: Galveston

Re: In case anyone is looking for SB730 and SB729

Postby seamusTX » Fri May 29, 2009 11:14 am

PC 42.07. HARASSMENT. (a) A person commits an offense if, with intent to harass, annoy, alarm, abuse, torment, or embarrass another, he:
(7) sends repeated electronic communications in a manner reasonably likely to harass, annoy, alarm, abuse, torment, embarrass, or offend another.
(b) In this section:
(1) "Electronic communication" ... includes:
(A) a communication initiated by electronic mail, instant message, network call, or facsimile machine
(c) An offense under this section is a Class B misdemeanor, except that the offense is a Class A misdemeanor if the actor has previously been convicted under this section.


- Jim
Fear, anger, hatred, and greed. The devil's all-you-can-eat buffet.


scott_dfw
Member
Posts: 62
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2007 3:58 pm
Location: Arlington, TX
Contact:

Re: In case anyone is looking for SB730 and SB729

Postby scott_dfw » Fri May 29, 2009 11:29 am

PC 42.07. HARASSMENT. (a) A person commits an offense if, with intent to harass, annoy, alarm, abuse, torment, or embarrass another, he:
(7) sends repeated electronic communications in a manner reasonably likely to harass, annoy, alarm, abuse, torment, embarrass, or offend another.
(b) In this section:
(1) "Electronic communication" ... includes:
(A) a communication initiated by electronic mail, instant message, network call, or facsimile machine
(c) An offense under this section is a Class B misdemeanor, except that the offense is a Class A misdemeanor if the actor has previously been convicted under this section.
It is a defense to prosecution under this section if the person acting as the harassor was provoked by extreme chubbing or otherwise neglectful treatment by the actor's state representatives.


:thumbs2:

:txflag:
(triple checked for profanity)

User avatar

roberts
Banned
Posts: 293
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 2:24 pm

Re: In case anyone is looking for SB730 and SB729

Postby roberts » Fri May 29, 2009 1:20 pm

AEA wrote:Well, how about 300,000 + calls to the Governor's Office DEMANDING a Special Session?

I think he should call a special session for the Voter ID bill. Nothing else. Show the chubbies that they're only hurting themselves.
THE SECOND AMENDMENT IS NOT ABOUT DUCK HUNTING


Return to “2009 Texas Legislative Session”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest