Supressor should be allowed for LTC/ CHL holder?

As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton


Abraham
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 8400
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:43 am

Re: Supressor should be allowed for LTC/ CHL holder?

#16

Post by Abraham »

"Should Be": The national anthem of wishful thinking people everywhere!

I should be: Younger/Look more like a human being rather than a troglodyte/Fabulously wealthy/Able to buy that villa in Tuscany I've always wanted/ and the list goes on and on and on...

I should be, sob, cough, choke, sniffle...able to...fly...without the aid of an airplane...
User avatar

tbrown
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 1685
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2011 4:47 pm

Re: Supressor should be allowed for LTC/ CHL holder?

#17

Post by tbrown »

Sad but true Abraham. Until "We the People" are willing to enforce "Shall Not Be Infringed" on the United States Constitution's "enemies, foreign and domestic" there's no reason for the forces of Mordor to back off.
sent to you from my safe space in the hill country
User avatar

Keith B
Moderator
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 18491
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 3:29 pm

Re: Silencer should be allowed for LTC/ CHL holder?

#18

Post by Keith B »

superchief wrote:Why limit it to LTC holders? Tell your representatives to support the "Hearing Protection Act" and let freedom ring!
Instead of your ears......
Keith
Texas LTC Instructor, Missouri CCW Instructor, NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun Instructor and RSO, NRA Life Member

Psalm 82:3-4
Post Reply

Return to “Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues”