For anti-2A zealots, there's never enough reasons to take your weapons

As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

Post Reply
User avatar

Topic author
bblhd672
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 4811
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 10:43 am
Location: TX

For anti-2A zealots, there's never enough reasons to take your weapons

#1

Post by bblhd672 »

https://www.kirklandreporter.com/northw ... arassment/

They want your guns, and they intend incrementally to have them.
The left lies about everything. Truth is a liberal value, and truth is a conservative value, but it has never been a left-wing value. People on the left say whatever advances their immediate agenda. Power is their moral lodestar; therefore, truth is always subservient to it. - Dennis Prager
User avatar

anygunanywhere
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 7863
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 9:16 am
Location: Richmond, Texas

Re: For anti-2A zealots, there's never enough reasons to take your weapons

#2

Post by anygunanywhere »

bblhd672 wrote:https://www.kirklandreporter.com/northw ... arassment/

They want your guns, and they intend incrementally to have them.
They intend incrementally to drive us into CW2.
"When democracy turns to tyranny, the armed citizen still gets to vote." Mike Vanderboegh

"The Smallest Minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities." – Ayn Rand

Soccerdad1995
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 4337
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 8:03 pm

Re: For anti-2A zealots, there's never enough reasons to take your weapons

#3

Post by Soccerdad1995 »

anygunanywhere wrote:
bblhd672 wrote:https://www.kirklandreporter.com/northw ... arassment/

They want your guns, and they intend incrementally to have them.
They intend incrementally to drive us into CW2.
Not to get picky, but it would be CW3.

For non-Texans, the chronology is CW1 where the colonists fought against the rest of Great Britain, and won; followed by CW2 where the Southerners fought against the Northerners, and lost.

For Texans, it's CW1 where the Texians fought against the rest of Mexico, and won; followed by CW2 where the Southerners fought against the Northerners, and lost.

I guess the next one would be CW2 for the territories that were added post the CW between the colonies and the rest of Great Britain. But for residents of the Republic of Texas, it would be CW3.

And to further complicate matters, it would be CW1 for any territories that were added after the War of Northern Aggression.
User avatar

Middle Age Russ
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1402
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2010 11:44 am
Location: Spring-Woodlands

Re: For anti-2A zealots, there's never enough reasons to take your weapons

#4

Post by Middle Age Russ »

Legislation and Regulation of firearms is not the only form of incrementalism that "Progressives" have employed to destroy individual Liberty and redefine the roles of Government and citizen.
Russ
Stay aware and engaged. Awareness buys time; time buys options. Survival may require moving quickly past the Observe, Orient and Decide steps to ACT.
NRA Life Member, CRSO, Basic Pistol, PPITH & PPOTH Instructor, Texas 4-H Certified Pistol & Rifle Coach, Texas LTC Instructor

Chemist45
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 863
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 10:43 pm
Location: Kingsland, TX

Re: For anti-2A zealots, there's never enough reasons to take your weapons

#5

Post by Chemist45 »

I have a real problem with laws that can take away a person's rights based on an accusation and nothing more.
Nearly one in three women experience some sort of domestic abuse, according to a the National Coalition Against Domestic Violence.
I call bull on that.
The same study said homicide is five times more likely when a gun is present during a domestic violence incident.
And double bull on that.
If the defender has a firearm, it isn't homicide it is self defense.
And that is what they should be pushing - arming not disarming.
User avatar

John Galt
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 682
Joined: Tue May 26, 2015 9:14 pm
Location: DFW

Re: For anti-2A zealots, there's never enough reasons to take your weapons

#6

Post by John Galt »

I'm shocked that is is a Democrat.

apostate
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 2336
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2007 10:01 am

Re: For anti-2A zealots, there's never enough reasons to take your weapons

#7

Post by apostate »

Chemist45 wrote:
The same study said homicide is five times more likely when a gun is present during a domestic violence incident.
And double bull on that.
If the defender has a firearm, it isn't homicide it is self defense.
And that is what they should be pushing - arming not disarming.
Oh, but it is homicide, albeit justified homicide.
User avatar

anygunanywhere
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 7863
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 9:16 am
Location: Richmond, Texas

Re: For anti-2A zealots, there's never enough reasons to take your weapons

#8

Post by anygunanywhere »

Soccerdad1995 wrote:
anygunanywhere wrote:
bblhd672 wrote:https://www.kirklandreporter.com/northw ... arassment/

They want your guns, and they intend incrementally to have them.
They intend incrementally to drive us into CW2.
Not to get picky, but it would be CW3.

For non-Texans, the chronology is CW1 where the colonists fought against the rest of Great Britain, and won; followed by CW2 where the Southerners fought against the Northerners, and lost.

For Texans, it's CW1 where the Texians fought against the rest of Mexico, and won; followed by CW2 where the Southerners fought against the Northerners, and lost.

I guess the next one would be CW2 for the territories that were added post the CW between the colonies and the rest of Great Britain. But for residents of the Republic of Texas, it would be CW3.

And to further complicate matters, it would be CW1 for any territories that were added after the War of Northern Aggression.
To stay with your not to get picky theme.

Whatever.
"When democracy turns to tyranny, the armed citizen still gets to vote." Mike Vanderboegh

"The Smallest Minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities." – Ayn Rand
Post Reply

Return to “Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues”