Very good point. People need to consider there is usually a huge difference in attitude/opinion between the rank and file officers and the chiefs and union leadership. It's important to not project the attitudes and opinions of one on the other.allisji wrote:Unfortunately the police chiefs and police unions get to speak on behalf of all off their members. I would venture to guess that most of the members probably would prefer that they did not. By and large, LEOs are the good guys, even if the people who represent them are not...ninjabread wrote:After hearing the anti gun half truths and outright lies from LE groups this legislative session, I will mind my own business if I see their members having a roadside disagreement with #BLM. I used to be pro law enforcement, but there's only so much "us versus them" rhetoric a man can take.flechero wrote:Be a good witness and call 911. That's what mere citizens are supposed to do, right?He then asked them why they were even carrying a gun, "Are you going to throw it at them?" This trooper was not happy. He went on to ask what they were going to do if they saw an LEO that needed help?
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Rights for me but not for thee! HB 560 fading, HB 873 alive?”
- Thu Apr 27, 2017 7:32 am
- Forum: 2017 Texas Legislative Session
- Topic: Rights for me but not for thee! HB 560 fading, HB 873 alive?
- Replies: 27
- Views: 14040
Re: Rights for me but not for thee! HB 560 fading, HB 873 alive?
- Tue Apr 25, 2017 11:11 am
- Forum: 2017 Texas Legislative Session
- Topic: Rights for me but not for thee! HB 560 fading, HB 873 alive?
- Replies: 27
- Views: 14040
Re: Rights for me but not for thee! HB 560 fading, HB 873 alive?
It comes down to too much power and control in one position, Speaker of the House. It only takes a few rino cronies in bed with the dems to control the whole show. The true conservatives are marginalized and outnumbered to the point they have been neutered.