I'm thinking that won't fly because if you're carrying concealed, they won't know you're armed, and thus wouldn't ask you to leave. The preference (their preference) would thus be for the concealed carrier to know that he's committing an offense by walking past the sign.TrueFlog wrote: I like the approach of making it a crime only if the individual is asked to leave and refuses. If we go that route, we can eliminate the 30.06 & 30.07 signage altogether along with the offense of "trespass by a license holder." This is the model used successfully by many other states. I agree that we are unlikely to achieve that all at once, but we can chip away at it like we did this session.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Gov. Abbott on constitutional carry”
- Wed Jul 08, 2015 10:43 am
- Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
- Topic: Gov. Abbott on constitutional carry
- Replies: 37
- Views: 17580
Re: Gov. Abbott on constitutional carry
- Tue Jun 23, 2015 9:43 pm
- Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
- Topic: Gov. Abbott on constitutional carry
- Replies: 37
- Views: 17580
Re: Gov. Abbott on constitutional carry
jmra wrote:anygunanywhere wrote:Reducing prohibited places for CHL is the most important next step. Unlicensed OC is a pipe dream.TXBO wrote:Unlicensed OC and licensed CC is a good next step. Criminals just don't open carry or use holsters.