philbo wrote: ↑
Fri Nov 09, 2018 9:47 pm
rotor wrote: ↑
Fri Nov 09, 2018 7:07 pm
Not saying there was "collusion" but if there was what statute would have been violated? Is collusion illegal?
Trump and his surrogates have repeatedly sought to delegitimize the special counsel’s investigation by saying there was “no collusion” and calling the special counsel’s probe a “witch hunt.” By focusing on the word "collusion" one might miss the fact that the convictions of trumps former associates and indictments of more than 2 dozen russians has instead relied on statutes containing words such as “conspiracy,” “obstruction of justice” and making “false statements.”
The indicted Russians are irrelevant and a joke.
Indicting Russians almost got Mueller in trouble when *) One org responded, and did not exist at the time, and *) One org responded and demanded discovery. Oops. This may still bode ill for him.
General Flynn will not spend one second in prison.
Papadopoulus is withdrawing his guilty plea, and is about to blow those behind the fake dossier apart.
Manafort's in the news about something, but I'm not interested. Something about causing Mueller more problems, even after pleading guilty to the first set of charges totally unrelated to muh Russia, for leniency in the next set of charges, or something like that. The judge is not happy with Mueller.
New Acting AG will be very busy. The SpyGate investigations are complete, now the indictments proceed.