Well, the followup question to that judge should have been something like, "But if someone without a permit walks past those .06/.07 signs, it's okay because they didn't have an LTC, and there was no 30.05 sign?"KC5AV wrote: ↑Tue Oct 19, 2021 11:07 amThat’s actually one of the questions I was waiting to have brought up yesterday. The RSD guys had little to say, but one guy said he’d spoken to a judge who indicated that, once your ID revealed that you were an LTC holder, they’d likely be harsher on you because you obviously had intent to violate 30.06/30.07. Take that for what it’s worth.jmorris wrote: ↑Mon Oct 18, 2021 10:07 pmI asked the instructor about that during the break and he said that they were aware of the traffic that question is generating but DPS had not gotten any clarification.troglodyte wrote: ↑Mon Oct 18, 2021 5:32 pm12 hours round-trip, hotel, and a PTO day. I overheard one gentleman say he was from Stratford.
They couldn't give a good answer to most of the questions. You'd think the DPS would anticipate the most common questions and get the AG to make an interpretation.
I was hoping for a better answer to if an LTC could carry under "Permitless Carry" if a business posted a 30.06/30.07 sign but no 30.05.
Like I said previously on the subject, this law will need a "cleanup bill" to clarify how this is really supposed to work.