[quote="Lindy"]Well, perhaps the "non-violent dispute resolution" part of the course could be replaced by having a lawyer tell you what it was going to cost in legal fees after you shoot someone. That might give some people an incentive to avoid shooting if they could.
Have you ever taken a CHL course? If the instructor didn't talk about the consequences of shooting, you were short-changed. And you might want to pay $500 for a CHL course, but most people couldn't afford it.
And I don't seem to remember a lot of CHL holders getting sued for shooting people. There have only been a few and they have all been justified. Maybe the lawsuit reforms have worked. The ambulance chasers won't take a case if they can't make a pot full of money.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “HB 685 by Rose - CHL range exemption”
- Sat Feb 05, 2005 11:50 pm
- Forum: 2005 Texas Legislative Session
- Topic: HB 685 by Rose - CHL range exemption
- Replies: 5
- Views: 8794
- Sat Feb 05, 2005 8:14 pm
- Forum: 2005 Texas Legislative Session
- Topic: HB 685 by Rose - CHL range exemption
- Replies: 5
- Views: 8794
I was reading some Brady group thing a few days ago and it mentioned that Texas was the only state that required non-violent dispute resolution. [/quote]
And I want the "non-violent dispute resolution" part taken out and the class time lowered to 8 hours for a new license. The pseudo-psychology involved in the course is a waste of time.
And I want the "non-violent dispute resolution" part taken out and the class time lowered to 8 hours for a new license. The pseudo-psychology involved in the course is a waste of time.