The ankle holsters I have seen are belt holster, the wrap around the ankle and attach to itself just as a belt around the waist. No where in the law does it say a belt has to go around the waist.Soccerdad1995 wrote:I think the concern was to prevent people from walking around with an unholstered weapon in their hand. Maybe change the requirement to just say "holster" so pocket holsters would also be OK. Personally, I am fine with a requirement for a holster that at least covers the trigger, but I don't see the harm in allowing a pocket holster, or even an ankle holster (if you are wearing shorts and sandals, for example.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Amend the "holster" requirement for OC????”
- Tue Nov 15, 2016 4:17 pm
- Forum: 2017 Legislative Wish List
- Topic: Amend the "holster" requirement for OC????
- Replies: 22
- Views: 10954
Re: Amend the "holster" requirement for OC????
- Thu Sep 29, 2016 9:09 am
- Forum: 2017 Legislative Wish List
- Topic: Amend the "holster" requirement for OC????
- Replies: 22
- Views: 10954
Re: Amend the "holster" requirement for OC????
If the open carry shoulder or belt holster was written for safety reasons, it would have required a level of retention instead of just requiring instructor to teach the advantages of retention. I understand not wanting people going around open carrying with the handgun in their hands. I really don't understand the concealed carry in the vehicle.