Probably nothing.The Annoyed Man wrote:I wonder what Bill Gates has been threatened with?
Bill and Melinda Gates are one of the biggest private donors to Planed Parenthood.
Return to “This is why I will not own any Apple products!”
Probably nothing.The Annoyed Man wrote:I wonder what Bill Gates has been threatened with?
Huge difference?rentz wrote:anygunanywhere wrote:What difference does which version of operating system does it make? They caved 70 times.rentz wrote:But what model and version of os? Older versions did not have the same security settings on by default . A phone with an older os may very likely be quite easy to get intoanygunanywhere wrote:Apple has unlocked phones 70 times before says the feds.
Apple does not dispute the figures.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2 ... efore.html
The article has a quote that Apple can unlock it and won't, which if true is where I disagree with them since they have a federal court order and the govt followed all required legal requirements ...but it still seems to be a lot of hearsay from both sides
Flexible ethics. The hallmark of progressivism.
huge difference, the old operating system they have said could be gotten into...the new one added default security settings which they say they cannot.
plus the issue isnt that they will or wont get into this phone its that they wont write backdoor into their code for law enforcement.
What difference does which version of operating system does it make? They caved 70 times.rentz wrote:But what model and version of os? Older versions did not have the same security settings on by default . A phone with an older os may very likely be quite easy to get intoanygunanywhere wrote:Apple has unlocked phones 70 times before says the feds.
Apple does not dispute the figures.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2 ... efore.html
The article has a quote that Apple can unlock it and won't, which if true is where I disagree with them since they have a federal court order and the govt followed all required legal requirements ...but it still seems to be a lot of hearsay from both sides
Is there really a difference between a government that is made up of a bunch of bumbling idiots trying to accomplish a goal of tyranny over the citizenry or a government skilled at accomplishing the same goal?JALLEN wrote:OTOH, we are bombarded daily with evidence of incompetent bungling, sloth, laziness, buffoonery, and various other reasons to conclude that the bureaucrats wear loafers because they can't tie their own shoes.anygunanywhere wrote:The government can already get into the phone.
Think about it for a second.
If the government was to publish "evidence" from the phone that proves terrorist intent without Apple's involvement it would prove publicly what most of us already know, which is they already have a back door. How many people are ignorant of the quantity of information and the many publicized examples of the government's gleaning of information? Does anyone really think that the government can't break into anything? Ask German chancellor Merkle.
The government is playing innocent. Ground yourself in reality.
Incompetence is always a plausible explanation for government activities and misadventures.
The saving grace is that if they want to badly enough, they command virtually limitless resources to throw at a problem, no matter what it costs or how long it may take. When you are spending someone else's money, there is no point in skimping.
Bitter Clinger wrote:Apple will fight a federal magistrate's order to help the Obama administration break into an encrypted iPhone belonging to one of the shooters in last December's deadly San Bernardino terror attack.
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/02/17/ap ... tcmp=hpbt1
As someone else famously said, "common sense is not so common"...