Return to “Las Vegas Mandalay Bay Active Shooter”
strogg wrote:That eases my mind. Because nothing is scarier than a gun that works like a shake weight.anygunanywhere wrote:The next one will not be as bad since bump stocks will be eliminated from the equation. Nothing to worry about.Abraham wrote:L.V. wants their income stream to stay stable.
When a repeat of what happened at M.B. occurs, how many are going there....?
The horror will be repeated at L.V. and somewhere else, like where you are...
Arm yourself if haven't already.
The next one will not be as bad since bump stocks will be eliminated from the equation. Nothing to worry about.Abraham wrote:L.V. wants their income stream to stay stable.
When a repeat of what happened at M.B. occurs, how many are going there....?
The horror will be repeated at L.V. and somewhere else, like where you are...
Arm yourself if haven't already.
*cough*FBI*cough*bblhd672 wrote:I have theories: (hey, some nights I don't sleep so well)strogg wrote:Preaching to the choir here. As others have said, the Vegas shooting is a bit more difficult to unravel than the church shooting. But still. It's been well over a month. The investigation must have yielded much information already. So why the hush hush? I tend not to be a conspiracy nut, as I believe in elegant, practical, and simple solutions. But the longer Clark County and the FBI drag this on, the more I think there really is a conspiracy going on here. All we have is basically equivalent to 1 day's worth of investigation. So... where's the rest?
1. Whatever agency was running this Op let it get badly out of control with unintended consequences. Releasing too much info will unravel the conspiracy. The info that has been released is so screwed up that they can't fix it, so going silent is the only choice.
2. There was no lone gunman, and they are still pursuing those responsible for planning, funding and execution of the event.
3. Or they know exactly who/what/when/why and need to ensure the citizens don't find out to prevent retaliation against the types of people who did it.
You are so cliche.TreyHouston wrote:What happens in Vegas stays in Vegas?
The grassy knoll.philip964 wrote:https://www.reviewjournal.com/crime/sho ... -shooting/
Las Vegas Sheriff's Department puts the brakes on information flow in Mass Shooting.
So they are going from nothing to less than nothing.
Was Lee Harvey Oswald involved now?
Just because someone buys a lot of guns or ammo doesn't mean they want to kill people. There's lots of folks on this forum that do that.striker55 wrote:My question is why do we report gun purchases but no one pays attention to someone who buys a lot of guns?
We will get exactly what the government wants to tell us.philip964 wrote:They haven't held a press conference in a long time.sjfcontrol wrote:Thread drift.TreyHouston wrote:What does this have to do with anything?
That's what happens when it's just leaked stuff.
How long does it take to inventory 43 guns? Give us a list?
How many were automatic?
How many were bump stock?
From bullets recovered from the victims, how many guns were used? Were they all found in the room?
Were there any other finger prints found on the guns besides the shooter?