That's not necessarily true. He was a burn patient. Not just a patient. Medical procedures should only be done on patients for the benefit the patient, not the state.philip964 wrote:To me there is a difference.WTR wrote:Who cares. The patient had been omitted to the hospital and was under hospital care. The Officer had no right to preform or demand a blood draw. This Officer ( or two) should be fired.philip964 wrote:Every story is different. Did she physically attempt to stop the officer from drawing blood or did she refused to draw blood?
A police officer tries to open my car trunk after he asks permission for me to open my trunk and I tell him respectfully that, no he does not have probably cause to search my trunk and no he does not have my consent. Do I now have the authority to forcibly stop him from violating my constitutional rights against unreasonable searches, using force if necessary? Did the nurse simply say no I will not draw the blood, or did she move and block his path to the patient and say you may not draw his blood?
The simple act of drawing blood would have not harmed the patient. If it would have she would have said so.
The patient was unconscious. He was therefore the responsibility of the medical professionals, not the police. Unconsciousness is no joke.
The officer did not meet any of the conditions required for drawing the blood and she showed him that.
There is no law there from what I understand that would have allowed him to draw the blood himself under those circunstances. And to think his "training" included considerations of burn patients is a stretch at best. I was just a Special Forces Medic, not a doctor, but I can assure you nobody layed a hand on my patients unless it was to improve their medical condition.
When asked by his fellow officer why they just didn't get a warrant, he replied "They don't have PC." He also said he had been told to arrest her.
This was a set up attempt at humbling and it blew up in their faces.
If he had been drawing the blood and the patient had died, would he have accepted even part of the blame?
He dragged a nurse out if an ER. Her house, in front of her superiors, peers and patients. Then he handcuffed her and put her in a corner to learn her lesson. Did he go back in and draw the blood himself? No. Why not?
I wonder how he'd like getting manhandled and zipped up in his house in front of his shift supervisor and junior officers and a bunch of prisoners?
You can't take back intimidation and humiliation. It doesn't work that way.