Yes, NRA ILA said it is a typo and should have been 2021.s3779m wrote: ↑Fri Dec 11, 2020 10:51 amWonder if the bottom line, "final action" has the wrong date and should be Feb. 2021? If so, we might see improvement by this summer.oljames3 wrote: ↑Fri Dec 11, 2020 10:01 am NRA ILA is hosting a webinar today. Started at 0830 Central. They say the ACOE proposed rule ...https://shared.nrapvf.org/sharedmedia/1 ... 13ed12.pdfWould amend 36 C.F.R. § 327.13 to read:
* An individual may possess or transport a weapon
[including ”any firearm”] on any project provided
that ... The individual is not otherwise prohibited
by Federal, state, or local law from possessing or
transporting such weapon; and ... The possession
or transportation of such weapon is in compliance
with applicable Federal, state, and local law.
* Comment period ended June 12, 2020
* Final action due Feb. 2020 (per Unified Agenda)
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Nesbitt (Morris) v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers!”
- Fri Dec 11, 2020 7:01 pm
- Forum: Federal
- Topic: Nesbitt (Morris) v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers!
- Replies: 51
- Views: 29525
Re: Nesbitt (Morris) v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers!
- Fri Dec 11, 2020 10:01 am
- Forum: Federal
- Topic: Nesbitt (Morris) v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers!
- Replies: 51
- Views: 29525
Re: Nesbitt (Morris) v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers!
NRA ILA is hosting a webinar today. Started at 0830 Central. They say the ACOE proposed rule ...
https://shared.nrapvf.org/sharedmedia/1 ... 13ed12.pdfWould amend 36 C.F.R. § 327.13 to read:
* An individual may possess or transport a weapon
[including ”any firearm”] on any project provided
that ... The individual is not otherwise prohibited
by Federal, state, or local law from possessing or
transporting such weapon; and ... The possession
or transportation of such weapon is in compliance
with applicable Federal, state, and local law.
* Comment period ended June 12, 2020
* Final action due Feb. 2020 (per Unified Agenda)