I thought I knew why they took this stance, but dang. Laid out that way, great decision.Charles L. Cotton wrote:http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2017/1 ... ks-genius/
Search found 4 matches
Return to “NRA Against Bump Fire Stocks?”
- Sun Oct 08, 2017 7:37 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: NRA Against Bump Fire Stocks?
- Replies: 40
- Views: 10915
Re: NRA Against Bump Fire Stocks?
- Thu Oct 05, 2017 6:51 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: NRA Against Bump Fire Stocks?
- Replies: 40
- Views: 10915
Re: NRA Against Bump Fire Stocks?
The way this should work is that anything she puts forth is ignored in favor of a better written amendment to the Share act or national reciprocity written by a republican. We shall see.ajwakeboarder wrote: It's never going to work that way. Diane Feinstein is working on a proposal to ban any part or component that will increase the rate of fire of a gun. This can be interpreted to include triggers, light bolt carrier groups, buffers, and adjustable gas blocks to name a few. If we cave on anything, it will not end well.
- Thu Oct 05, 2017 6:50 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: NRA Against Bump Fire Stocks?
- Replies: 40
- Views: 10915
Re: NRA Against Bump Fire Stocks?
This is my fear as well.parabelum wrote:With a caveat that our legislation gets passed and enacted first and foremost, which I fear will not be the case.Excaliber wrote:I think agreeing to regulation of bump fire stocks in exchange for deregulation of suppressors and passage of national reciprocity might not be a bad deal at all.
- Thu Oct 05, 2017 6:48 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: NRA Against Bump Fire Stocks?
- Replies: 40
- Views: 10915
Re: NRA Against Bump Fire Stocks?
I agree.Excaliber wrote:I think agreeing to regulation of bump fire stocks in exchange for deregulation of suppressors and passage of national reciprocity might not be a bad deal at all.