No, because the prosecution & defendant cut a deal, which ended the trial before it would have established precedent.warnmar10 wrote: ↑Sun Oct 13, 2019 9:44 pmIt would have to wouldn't it? Maybe not nation wide but in the 9th circuit, no?TreyHouston wrote: ↑Sun Oct 13, 2019 9:11 pmI wonder if this could reverse other charges for people in the same situation??
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.co ... index.html
More to the story, thought:
The judge
. Seems he was charging $1,000 for complete AR's, using 80% lowers, to quite a diverse 'customer' base.... did find that Roh was guilty of selling completed firearms without a license, subjecting him to a possible prison sentence.
And, the ATF had already warned him more than once that he needed to cease operations, unless he obtained a FFL for manufacturing.His customers, according to records seized in the search, included 19 convicted felons, six domestic abusers, and one person prohibited from possessing guns "due to mental health unfitness." One customer, who had a felony conviction for making terrorist threats, later admitted to buying guns and gun parts from Roh that he then trafficked in Mexico, according to court records.
Now he's selling industrial vacuums .