Search found 3 matches
- Tue Dec 29, 2015 6:59 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Open carry: negative ramifications
- Replies: 39
- Views: 12240
Re: Open carry: negative ramifications
A company can't post a §30.06 sign in a parking lot and enforce it against an employee.
Clarification: They can enforce 30.06 if the licensed employee removes the handgun from his/her car in the parking lot and it is concealed. (Which begs the question of how the employer would know unless they ...
- Tue Dec 29, 2015 6:00 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Open carry: negative ramifications
- Replies: 39
- Views: 12240
Re: Open carry: negative ramifications
Welcome to the forum.
Thanks. Interesting stuff. I never carry but had my CHL when they first came out. It lapsed and I never renewed because the only time I ever carry is in my car.
A 30.06 or 30.07 sign will be meaningless to a person without a CHL or LTC that has a concealed handgun in their ...
Thanks. Interesting stuff. I never carry but had my CHL when they first came out. It lapsed and I never renewed because the only time I ever carry is in my car.
A 30.06 or 30.07 sign will be meaningless to a person without a CHL or LTC that has a concealed handgun in their ...
- Mon Dec 28, 2015 7:45 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Open carry: negative ramifications
- Replies: 39
- Views: 12240
Re: Open carry: negative ramifications
30.06 is not applicable to anyone in a vehicle whether they have a CHL or not. Theoretically a 30.07 sign WILL be enforceable even if you're in a vehicle, and will be a class C until you're told to leave.
Looking at the revised statute, it appears that "concealed" is never defined (they struck ...
Looking at the revised statute, it appears that "concealed" is never defined (they struck ...