Search found 3 matches

by TexasTornado
Fri Sep 30, 2016 4:56 pm
Forum: 2017 Legislative Wish List
Topic: 2017 Legislative Priorities
Replies: 200
Views: 61040

Re: 2017 Legislative Priorities

Soccerdad1995 wrote:
Ruark wrote:
KLB wrote:Our comments are, insofar as I have noticed them, all about expanding our rights. That's a good thing to think about and to be prepared to address. But what if the anti-gunners have an agenda of their own? Has anyone given any thought to what they might try to roll back and how we might counter that? I was speaking to a friend who predicted this will be a rollback session for gun rights.
I was told by a senior senate staff member that the antis (e.g. the Moms) were going to make a real hard push to replace the 06/07 signs with downloadable gunbuster signs. They have the full support of the Texas Association of Businesses, which represents over 4,000 Texas businesses. The requirement to plaster the front of your business with the big, ugly current signage is reportedly a major sore spot in the business community. Just a heads-up.
There is no requirement for any business to post any signs related to guns other than required TABC blue / red signs.

If a business owner wants to restrict the civil right of their customers to keep and bear arms, then there is a legal mechanism for them to do that. And that legal mechanism includes the use of signage as one of several options. I don't think that is too onerous of a requirement before you are allowed to restrict the civil rights of others.
:iagree: the could hand out business cards with the info or have their greeters tell everyone at the door. Signage isn't incumbent upon them.
by TexasTornado
Fri Sep 02, 2016 8:29 pm
Forum: 2017 Legislative Wish List
Topic: 2017 Legislative Priorities
Replies: 200
Views: 61040

Re: 2017 Legislative Priorities

KLB wrote:
mr1337 wrote:Already required but there's no enforcement of it.
OK, then a legislatively imposed remedy that the trespass charge will not stand. You ought to have notice when you book your room, not when you stagger into the motel after a long day on the road.
I would rather the statute just provide an explicit exemption under 30.06/30.07 for those staying at the hotel.
by TexasTornado
Sat Aug 20, 2016 4:15 am
Forum: 2017 Legislative Wish List
Topic: 2017 Legislative Priorities
Replies: 200
Views: 61040

Re: 2017 Legislative Priorities

Language defining that 30.06/07 statutes do not apply to hotel guests or apartment renters and may not be enforced in these cases.

Make property owners responsible for the posting and upkeep of signage regardless of whether the property is rented. (Make city's responsible for the actions of their tenants regarding signage).

Return to “2017 Legislative Priorities”