TexasCHLforum.com

Sure sounds like they are trying to paint a Russian whitewash on this before the release of the FBI documents.

I have a feeling William Barr, is going to stir up a lot of folks, before he gets through.
I'm curious though, if Rattner told her Fox news bosses about this, why did they sit on it?

Color me skeptical.

I don't know whether Seth Rich, was a hacked email source or not, but this report is sure trying to tie up loose ends, and point the finger of blame, for all things HRC at Russia.

A few questions come to mind.

Before the body was cold, an obscure Russian site, posits the theory, that this previously unknown staffer, was killed for passing hacked emails. Why? Just to throw cold water, on the MSM talking point, that it was Russia?

Julian Assange knows who his source was for the hacked emails. If Seth Rich was not involved, why put up reward money, for finding the killer?

A US attorney, somehow, discovers that the source of this conspiracy theory, was this obscure Russian web site, and so informs, Muller, so that this can be put to rest. Why was Muller even interested? Do we have any other US attorneys, with potential bias? (Strzok and Page?)

Besides, this report, how do we know, where Fox news got the theory? Are they constantly scanning obscure Russian web sites looking for stories?

Maybe it's just my grassy knoll, but this sure sounds like it was an attempt to wrap this up in a neat bow. Even though the story, has not even been discussed for two years. JMHO

I'll bet the Democrats are regretting promoting an independent council like Mueller now. If he grants immunity from copywrite infringement charges, the whole Russia conspiracy will blow up in their face. Not to mention the suspicion of conspiracy to commit murder against Weiner and all of HRC cohorts.

This must be what she meant when she told her staff that they would all hang together.

allisji wrote:Well, now we've got claims that the Russians killed Seth Rich because he knew too much. This coming from a so-called Republican lobbyist.

Is that because lobbyists, are read in, on all police investigations?


Sounds like everyone wants to get their name in the news.

philip964 wrote:Story on DNC staffer's murder dominated conservative media -- hours later it fell apart - CNN Money
https://apple.news/ANYaHE7rcSWW5JOTyLjxbqw

CNN saying it's all fake news.

Of course they are. I noticed, there was no denial of the award put up by Assange.

Beat me to it!!

Asssange has put up a reward? The victim's computer in the possession of either the D.C. Police or the FBI? Private investigator hired on behalf of the family? Russian conspiracy first mentioned right after his death? Timed to have the story lost in the aftermath of the Dallas shooting?

Nothing to see here, because,ya know,Trump is giving away national secrets to Russia. It must be true people who weren't there said so.

There is nothing new with the Clinton's body count.

http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/anot ... increases/
Just business as usual.

I guess there's no sense in even hoping the police can get there in time, just wait until the shot spotter system directs them to your body so they can do the chalk outline.

I feel bad for the loss of such a young man, I just wish that he could have seen the fallacy of the democratic platform regarding his right to self defense. Sounds like "gun free" DC has a major armed crime problem. How does the anti 2A police chief explain that? They refuse to issue carry permits, but somehow the bad guys don't seem have a problem circumventing to law. If only someone would have known that this might happen.