By far the most desired outcome of the 2017 session.Jusme wrote:Of course I want to remove all restrictions, for LTC holders, that aren't placed on LEOs.
Search found 4 matches
Return to “2017 Legislative Priorities”
- Fri Sep 09, 2016 2:12 pm
- Forum: 2017 Legislative Wish List
- Topic: 2017 Legislative Priorities
- Replies: 200
- Views: 60126
Re: 2017 Legislative Priorities
- Wed Aug 31, 2016 9:41 am
- Forum: 2017 Legislative Wish List
- Topic: 2017 Legislative Priorities
- Replies: 200
- Views: 60126
Re: 2017 Legislative Priorities
I'd like to see every business that prohibits the most lawful of Texans to carry handguns be required to put it on their website. And register their signs with the state so it can be researched by LTC's prior to driving to the site.mr1337 wrote:Already required but there's no enforcement of it.KLB wrote:What about requiring hotels, motels, and the like to post on their websites if they have a 30.06 or 30.07 sign?
- Thu Aug 25, 2016 2:44 pm
- Forum: 2017 Legislative Wish List
- Topic: 2017 Legislative Priorities
- Replies: 200
- Views: 60126
Re: 2017 Legislative Priorities
Another winning idea! Yes, Mr. Business Owner, you do have the right to ban Texas "good guys" from your establishment, however to do so you must apply with the state in order to exercise that right to post the signs. And don't forget to include the paperwork that your "security instructor" gave you upon completion of your class and practical demonstration in business security.locke_n_load wrote:What I did like in one of the other threads, is that properties would have to apply with DPS for 30.06/30.07 signs that have some sort of official seal on them and the address for which they apply. In this manner, private property applies/gets signs easily if they wish, but signs that are intended to go on public property, especially for temporary events, would not be granted.
- Thu Aug 25, 2016 2:38 pm
- Forum: 2017 Legislative Wish List
- Topic: 2017 Legislative Priorities
- Replies: 200
- Views: 60126
Re: 2017 Legislative Priorities
Since the statistics show that LTC holders are more law abiding that LEO's, why restrict our ability to carry places that a LEO can carry?locke_n_load wrote:Or we could just pass a bill similar to last year's HB308, where an LTC holder can carry anywhere an officer can. Eliminates time and cost to develop and make a program for an "enhanced" LTC, and lessens restrictions for all current LTC holders.