Search found 5 matches
Return to “M&P®380 SHIELD™ EZ™ Consumer Advisory”
- Tue Apr 10, 2018 10:36 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: M&P®380 SHIELD™ EZ™ Consumer Advisory
- Replies: 17
- Views: 2423
Re: M&P®380 SHIELD™ EZ™ Consumer Advisory
makes sense.
- Tue Apr 10, 2018 8:08 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: M&P®380 SHIELD™ EZ™ Consumer Advisory
- Replies: 17
- Views: 2423
Re: M&P®380 SHIELD™ EZ™ Consumer Advisory
haha we must be related somehowmontgomery wrote:Jesus, we are related. The only external safety that never fails is trigger indexed on the frame. The only internal safety required on a striker fired pistol is the drop safety.Grundy1133 wrote:Personally, I find safety's on a carry gun to be pointless. A trigger safety is good enough for me. But for curiosity sake, is that advisory for the +P and +P+ ammo or just any high grain ammo that causes "high" recoil?
- Tue Apr 10, 2018 12:38 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: M&P®380 SHIELD™ EZ™ Consumer Advisory
- Replies: 17
- Views: 2423
Re: M&P®380 SHIELD™ EZ™ Consumer Advisory
Gotcha.cmgee67 wrote:Grundy1133 wrote:I suppose. my mentality is if you're carrying you should have enough trigger discipline to not be touching that trigger until you're ready to shoot. I agree trigger safety's are useless as well but with those I don't have to do something before pulling the trigger. my finger is already in the firing position when engaging the safety... I've never had a 1911, but i imagine you'd want the safety because its hammer fired?Liberty wrote:I suppose, but a case could be made that trigger safetys are pointless. I wouldn't want to carry a 1911 without it's safety. A lot depends on the specific gun, the method of carry, the training and a users comfort level.Grundy1133 wrote:Personally, I find safety's on a carry gun to be pointless. A trigger safety is good enough for me. But for curiosity sake, is that advisory for the +P and +P+ ammo or just any high grain ammo that causes "high" recoil?
Different strokes and all of that.
You want the safety on a 1911 because a 1911 is a single action pistol. There are plenty of guns that are hammer fired that don’t have a safety. Sig 226,229 etc.... they are double action / single action pistols with hammers. The long double action pull is the safety. Just like a double action revovler.
- Tue Apr 10, 2018 11:54 am
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: M&P®380 SHIELD™ EZ™ Consumer Advisory
- Replies: 17
- Views: 2423
Re: M&P®380 SHIELD™ EZ™ Consumer Advisory
I suppose. my mentality is if you're carrying you should have enough trigger discipline to not be touching that trigger until you're ready to shoot. I agree trigger safety's are useless as well but with those I don't have to do something before pulling the trigger. my finger is already in the firing position when engaging the safety... I've never had a 1911, but i imagine you'd want the safety because its hammer fired?Liberty wrote:I suppose, but a case could be made that trigger safetys are pointless. I wouldn't want to carry a 1911 without it's safety. A lot depends on the specific gun, the method of carry, the training and a users comfort level.Grundy1133 wrote:Personally, I find safety's on a carry gun to be pointless. A trigger safety is good enough for me. But for curiosity sake, is that advisory for the +P and +P+ ammo or just any high grain ammo that causes "high" recoil?
Different strokes and all of that.
- Tue Apr 10, 2018 11:11 am
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: M&P®380 SHIELD™ EZ™ Consumer Advisory
- Replies: 17
- Views: 2423
Re: M&P®380 SHIELD™ EZ™ Consumer Advisory
Personally, I find safety's on a carry gun to be pointless. A trigger safety is good enough for me. But for curiosity sake, is that advisory for the +P and +P+ ammo or just any high grain ammo that causes "high" recoil?