Here's one word that explains the cognitive dissonance...... "Philadelphia."MedicMan218 wrote:Probably???She said Eells had a license to carry a firearm and probably would not be charged.
There should be NO QUESTION!
A.) He should be covered under the Castle Doctrine and
B.) He was wounded too. So, unless he shot himself its an obvious, slam dunk case of pure self defense.
Formalities I suppose but still, they shouldn't even entertain the idea of possibly charging him.
Search found 1 match
Search found 1 match • Page 1 of 1
- Fri Sep 09, 2011 12:44 pm
- Forum: Concealed Carry on College Campuses
- Topic: College student fends off armed robbers
- Replies: 13
- Views: 1837