Search found 1 match

by The Annoyed Man
Wed Jul 11, 2018 2:29 pm
Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
Topic: Ballistic testing - Academic discussion v. real performance
Replies: 10
Views: 2608

Re: Ballistic testing - Academic discussion v. real performance

I am subscribed to Harrell’s YouTube channel. At first, I found his ballistics testing to be unconventional. But upon reflection, I have also become a convert to thinking that his methods are probably more valid than ballistics gel.

I think that ballistic gel is valid for one thing - and that is trying to demonstrate the ideal expansion of a hollowpoint bullet. But that is no indicator of how it will actually perform in an animal’s or human’s body.

Return to “Ballistic testing - Academic discussion v. real performance”